enow.com Web Search

Search results

1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network

2. List of proprietary source-available software - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_proprietary_source...

   This is a list of proprietary source-available software, which has available source code, but is not classified as free software or open-source software. In some cases, this type of software is originally sold and released without the source code , and the source code becomes available later.

3. Contributor License Agreement - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contributor_License_Agreement

   KDE uses Free Software Foundation Europe's Fiduciary Licence Agreement [50] of which (FLA-1.2) states in section 3.3: FSFE shall only exercise the granted rights and licences in accordance with the principles of Free Software as defined by the Free Software Foundations.

4. End-user license agreement - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/End-user_license_agreement

   Software licensing agreements usually prohibit resale, enabling the company to maximize revenue. [20] Proprietary software is usually offered under a restrictive license that bans copying and reuse and often limits the purchaser to using the software on one computer. [21] [22] Source code is rarely available.

5. Software copyright - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_copyright

   These software license agreements are often labeled as end-user license agreements . Another impact of the decision was the rise of the shrink-wrap closed source business model, where before a source code driven software distribution schema dominated. [15] [17]

6. Proprietary software - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proprietary_software

   The difference is that whether proprietary software can be distributed, and what the fee would be, is at the proprietor's discretion. With free software, anyone who has a copy can decide whether, and how much, to charge for a copy or related services. [60] Proprietary software that comes for no cost is called freeware.

7. Comparison of free and open-source software licenses

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_free_and...

   This table lists for each license what organizations from the FOSS community have approved it – be it as a "free software" or as an "open source" license – , how those organizations categorize it, and the license compatibility between them for a combined or mixed derivative work. Organizations usually approve specific versions of software ...

8. Software relicensing - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_relicensing

   An early example of an open-source project that did successfully re-license for license compatibility reasons is the Mozilla project and their Firefox browser. The source code of Netscape's Communicator 4.0 browser was originally released in 1998 under the Netscape Public License/Mozilla Public License [6] but was criticised by the FSF and OSI for being incompatible.

9. Multi-licensing - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multi-licensing

   In this scenario, one option is a proprietary software license, which allows the possibility of creating proprietary applications derived from it, while the other license is a copyleft free software/open-source license, thus requiring any derived work to be released under the same license. The copyright holder of the software then typically ...