Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
New York v. Trump is a civil investigation and lawsuit by the office of the New York Attorney General (AG) alleging that individuals and business entities within The Trump Organization engaged in financial fraud by presenting vastly disparate property values to potential lenders and tax officials, in violation of New York Executive Law § 63(12).
Trump is a civil investigation and lawsuit by the office of the New York Attorney General (AG) alleging that The Trump Organization and several individuals (including operative members of the Trump family) engaged in financial fraud by presenting vastly disparate property values to potential lenders and tax officials, in violation of New York ...
Trump demands immediate dismissal of New York "hush money" criminal case ... They were in fact repayments for a $130,000 wire payment Cohen made to the lawyer of an adult film star days before the ...
On February 16, 2024 New York Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron ruled that four of the defendants in New York's civil case against the Trump Organization (Donald Trump, Eric Trump, Donald Trump Jr., and Allen Weisselberg) be required to pay a total of $364 million, with Donald Trump being ordered to pay $355 million.
Trump was found guilty May 30 of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in order to cover up a hush money payment to buy porn star Stormy Daniels' silence ahead of the 2016 presidential ...
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
People of the State of New York v. Trump Court New York Supreme Court Full case name The People of the State of New York v. Donald J. Trump Submitted March 30, 2023 Started April 15, 2024 Decided May 30, 2024 Verdict Guilty on all counts Charge First-degree falsifying business records (34 counts) Citation IND-71543-23 Court membership Judge sitting Juan Merchan This article is part of a series ...
Permanent Mission of India v. City of New York: 551 U.S. 193 (2007) whether a municipality can sue other countries to collect unpaid taxes Bowles v. Russell: 551 U.S. 205 (2007) Federal Courts of Appeals lack jurisdiction to hear habeas appeals that are filed late, even if the district court said the petitioner had additional time to file ...