Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Wal-Mart v. Dukes, 564 U.S. 338 (2011), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that a group of roughly 1.5 million women could not be certified as a valid class of plaintiffs in a class-action lawsuit for employment discrimination against Walmart.
Walmart Stores, Inc., was filed against Walmart, alleging that female employees were discriminated against in matters regarding pay and promotions. A class action suit was sought, which would have been the nation's largest in history, covering 1.5 million past and current employees. [ 146 ]
Office of Compliance logo. The Office of Congressional Workplace Rights (OCWR; formerly the Office of Compliance) [1] was created through the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 (CAA) which applied workplace protection laws to approximately 30,000 employees of the legislative branch nationwide and established the Office of Compliance to administer and ensure the integrity of the Act ...
Walmart, the nation’s largest private employer, is the latest company to make changes to its diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives under pressure from a conservative activist.. The retail ...
"It's clear by our actions and those of other companies that the federal minimum wage is lagging behind. $7.25 is too low," says Doug McMillon.
A coalition of major business groups, backing Walmart in the appeal, call the NLRB decision a “dangerous precedent that seriously upsets" labor law. Walmart Case in 9th Circuit Tests Scope of ...
Griggs v. Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971), was a court case argued before the Supreme Court of the United States on December 14, 1970. It concerned employment discrimination and the disparate impact theory, and was decided on March 8, 1971. [1]
Breaking news as Walmart CEO calls on Congress to raise minimum wage. Yahoo Finance's Julia La Roche reports to Julie Hyman and Adam Shapiro. She also sits down with Walmart's Judith McKenna