enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Shelby County v. Holder - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shelby_County_v._Holder

    Shelby County v. Holder, 570 U.S. 529 (2013), is a landmark decision [1] of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding the constitutionality of two provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965: Section 5, which requires certain states and local governments to obtain federal preclearance before implementing any changes to their voting laws or practices; and subsection (b) of Section 4 ...

  3. South Carolina v. Katzenbach - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Carolina_v._Katzenbach

    South Carolina v. Katzenbach, 383 U.S. 301 (1966), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court that rejected a challenge from the state of South Carolina to the preclearance provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which required that some states submit changes in election districts to the Attorney General of the United States (at the time, Nicholas Katzenbach). [1]

  4. Chiafalo v. Washington - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chiafalo_v._Washington

    The Supreme Court's decision was highly anticipated with respect to the upcoming 2020 presidential election. Though faithless electors have never changed the outcome of an election, some argue the possibility that faithless votes could affect the outcome in a close election increased in light of the events of 2016. [ 40 ]

  5. Supreme Court election law ruling heralded as a win for ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-election-law...

    The Supreme Court’s ruling in an election law case Tuesday prompted many loud commendations from those who celebrated the majority-conservative court’s rejection of something called the ...

  6. The Supreme Court has ignited new fears about how it may ...

    www.aol.com/supreme-court-sowing-confusion-over...

    After all, a district court’s original decision blocking Arizona’s law was issued in late 2023 – more than a year from the election. The Supreme Court last invoked the Purcell principle in ...

  7. Independent state legislature theory - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Independent_state...

    Harper, 600 U.S. 1 (2023), is a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States that rejected the independent state legislature theory (ISL), a theory that asserts state legislatures have sole authority to establish election laws for federal elections within their respective states without judicial review by state courts, without presentment ...

  8. How the Trump election subversion indictment changed after ...

    www.aol.com/trump-indictment-loses-allegations...

    The special counsel’s new indictment charging former President Donald Trump for his efforts to overturn the 2020 election made changes large and small to accommodate the Supreme Court’s ...

  9. Moore v. Harper - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore_v._Harper

    Moore v. Harper, 600 U.S. 1 (2023), is a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States that rejected the independent state legislature theory (ISL), a theory that asserts state legislatures have sole authority to establish election laws for federal elections within their respective states without judicial review by state courts, without presentment to state governors, and without ...