enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Euclidean algorithm - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euclidean_algorithm

    For example, 6 and 35 factor as 6 = 2 × 3 and 35 = 5 × 7, so they are not prime, but their prime factors are different, so 6 and 35 are coprime, with no common factors other than 1. A 24×60 rectangle is covered with ten 12×12 square tiles, where 12 is the GCD of 24 and 60.

  3. Euclid's theorem - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euclid's_theorem

    Euclid offered a proof published in his work Elements (Book IX, Proposition 20), [1] which is paraphrased here. [2] Consider any finite list of prime numbers p 1, p 2, ..., p n. It will be shown that there exists at least one additional prime number not included in this list. Let P be the product of all the prime numbers in the list: P = p 1 p ...

  4. Fundamental theorem of arithmetic - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_theorem_of...

    Factors p 0 = 1 may be inserted without changing the value of n (for example, 1000 = 2 3 ×3 0 ×5 3). In fact, any positive integer can be uniquely represented as an infinite product taken over all the positive prime numbers, as = = =,

  5. Integer factorization - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integer_factorization

    Continuing this process until every factor is prime is called prime factorization; the result is always unique up to the order of the factors by the prime factorization theorem. To factorize a small integer n using mental or pen-and-paper arithmetic, the simplest method is trial division : checking if the number is divisible by prime numbers 2 ...

  6. Inclusion–exclusion principle - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inclusion–exclusion...

    is identically zero because: if x is not in A, then all factors are 0−0 = 0; and otherwise, if x does belong to some A m, then the corresponding m th factor is 1−1=0. By expanding the product on the left-hand side, equation ( 4 ) follows.

  7. Mathematical proof - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_proof

    This contradicts our previous statement that a and b have no common factor, so we must conclude that is an irrational number. To paraphrase: if one could write 2 {\displaystyle {\sqrt {2}}} as a fraction , this fraction could never be written in lowest terms, since 2 could always be factored from numerator and denominator.

  8. Debt consolidation vs. debt payoff vs. debt counseling: What ...

    www.aol.com/finance/debt-consolidation-vs-debt...

    Two of the most common debt payoff strategies are the ... Robert faces $15,000 across three credit cards with rates ranging from 18% APR to 24% APR. After reviewing monthly expenses, he finds an ...

  9. Gauss's lemma (polynomials) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gauss's_lemma_(polynomials)

    Proof: Clearly the product f(x)g(x) of two primitive polynomials has integer coefficients. Therefore, if it is not primitive, there must be a prime p which is a common divisor of all its coefficients. But p cannot divide all the coefficients of either f(x) or g(x) (otherwise they would not be primitive).