enow.com Web Search

Search results

1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network

2. Apple Inc. v. Pepper - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Inc._v._Pepper

   Apple Inc. v. Pepper, 587 U.S. ___ (2019), was a United States Supreme Court case related to antitrust laws related to third-party resellers. [1] The case centers on Apple Inc.'s App Store, and whether consumers of apps offered through the store have Article III standing under federal antitrust laws to bring a class-action antitrust lawsuit against Apple for practices it uses to regulate the ...

3. Litigation involving Apple Inc. - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Litigation_involving_Apple...

   The case In re Apple iPod iTunes Antitrust Litigation was filed as a class action in 2005 [9] claiming Apple violated the U.S. antitrust statutes in operating a music-downloading monopoly that it created by changing its software design to the proprietary FairPlay encoding in 2004, resulting in other vendors' music files being incompatible with and thus inoperable on the iPod. [10]

4. Apple Computer, Inc. v. Franklin Computer Corp. - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Computer,_Inc._v...

   The Court remanded the case to the District Court for a determination regarding whether Apple's operating system was one of a very limited number of ways to achieve its function. If it was, then Franklin would not be liable for copyright infringement. The parties settled. Apple was able to force Franklin to withdraw its clones by 1988.

5. Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Inc._v._Samsung...

   Apple and Samsung litigated patent infringement cases in several European nations starting in 2011, with implications for device sales across all of the European Union. [ 75 ] [ 76 ] In August 2011, the Landgericht Court in Germany granted Apple's request for an EU-wide injunction banning Samsung from selling its Galaxy Tab 10.1 device, on the ...

6. Apple Computer, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp. - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Computer,_Inc._v...

   Much of the court's ruling was based on the original licensing agreement between Apple and Microsoft for Windows 1.0, and this fact made the case more of a contractual matter than of copyright law, to the chagrin of Apple. This also meant that the court avoided a more far-reaching "look and feel copyright" precedent ruling.

7. Judge in fake electors case recuses himself following ...

   www.aol.com/news/judge-fake-electors-case...

   (The Center Square) – Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Bruce Cohen has recused himself from Arizona’s ongoing “fake electors” case, following a plea for his dismissal by Sen. Jake ...