enow.com Web Search

Search results

1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network

2. Comparison of free and open-source software licenses

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_free_and...

   FOSS stands for "Free and Open Source Software". There is no one universally agreed-upon definition of FOSS software and various groups maintain approved lists of licenses. The Open Source Initiative (OSI) is one such organization keeping a list of open-source licenses. [1] The Free Software Foundation (FSF) maintains a list of what it ...

3. Open-source license - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open-source_license

   Popular open source licenses include the Apache License, the MIT License, the GNU General Public License (GPL), the BSD Licenses, the GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL) and the Mozilla Public License (MPL). Open-source licenses are software licenses that allow content to be used, modified, and shared. They facilitate free and open-source ...

4. List of free-content licences - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_free-content_licences

   For information on software-related licences, see Comparison of free and open-source software licenses. A variety of free-content licences exist, some of them tailored to a specific purpose. Also listed are open-hardware licences, which may be used on design documents of and custom-made software for open-source hardware.

5. Permissive software license - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permissive_software_license

   The Open Source Initiative defines a permissive software license as a "non-copyleft license that guarantees the freedoms to use, modify and redistribute". [6] GitHub's choosealicense website describes the permissive MIT license as "[letting] people do anything they want with your code as long as they provide attribution back to you and don't hold you liable."

6. Historical Permission Notice and Disclaimer - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_Permission...

   It is unique among the OSI's licenses because of the choices it allows in its construction. It lets the licensor pick anywhere from 0-2 warranty disclaimers, whether they want to prohibit the author's name from being used in publicity or advertising surrounding a distribution (like in the BSD License), and other spelling and grammar options.

7. Portal:Free and open-source software - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal:Free_and_open...

   Free-software licenses and open-source licenses are used by many software packages today. The free software movement and the open-source software movement are online social movements behind widespread production, adoption and promotion of FOSS, with the former preferring to use the term free/libre and open-source software (FLOSS).

8. WTFPL - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WTFPL

   The license was confirmed as a GPL-compatible free software license by the Free Software Foundation, but its use is "not recommended". [1] In 2009, the Open Source Initiative chose not to approve the license as an open-source license due to redundancy with the Fair License. [2] The WTFPL version 2 is an accepted Copyfree license. [14]

9. Academic Free License - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academic_Free_License

   The Academic Free License (AFL) is a permissive free software license written in 2002 by Lawrence E. Rosen, a former general counsel of the Open Source Initiative (OSI). The license grants similar rights to the BSD, MIT, UoI/NCSA and Apache licenses – licenses allowing the software to be made proprietary – but was written to correct ...