enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Citizens United v. FEC - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_United_v._FEC

    Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding campaign finance laws and free speech under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

  3. Buckley v. Valeo - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buckley_v._Valeo

    Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1 (1976), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court on campaign finance.A majority of justices held that, as provided by section 608 of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, limits on election expenditures are unconstitutional.

  4. Campaign finance reform amendment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campaign_finance_reform...

    Valeo (1976), which asserted corporate spending to political candidates and parties is the equivalent of free speech, and First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti (1978), which established that non-media business corporations can give unrestricted money to "influence or affect" voter opinions in state political referendums. [39] [40]

  5. Opinion: Why the NetChoice ruling is a win for free speech - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/opinion-why-netchoice-ruling...

    In the NetChoice decisions from the Supreme Court, the underlying issues are truly about the First Amendment rights of private businesses, not a special privilege of certain tech companies, writes ...

  6. Campaign finance reform in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campaign_finance_reform_in...

    FEC decision that equated money spent on political speech with the speech itself (thus giving such spending First Amendment protection), CFR28 specifically targets independent political advertising for elimination. It does this by defining advertising as uninvited media that costs more than the limit mentioned above.

  7. Opinion: When ‘free speech’ becomes a bully’s free pass

    www.aol.com/opinion-going-wrong-direction-online...

    The Supreme Court’s recent ruling that makes it harder to hold people responsible for harassment online could send a troubling symbolic message about free speech to institutions other than ...

  8. First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_National_Bank_of...

    First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti, 435 U.S. 765 (1978), is a U.S. constitutional law case which defined the free speech right of corporations for the first time. . The United States Supreme Court held that corporations have a First Amendment right to make contributions to ballot initiative campaigns

  9. 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/303_Creative_LLC_v._Elenis

    303 Creative LLC v. Elenis, 600 U.S. 570 (2023), is a United States Supreme Court decision that dealt with the intersection of anti-discrimination law in public accommodations with the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. In a 6–3 decision, the Court found for a website designer, ruling that the state ...