Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
United States v. Miller , 307 U.S. 174 (1939), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States that involved a Second Amendment to the United States Constitution challenge to the National Firearms Act of 1934 (NFA).
United States v. James Miller , 471 U.S. 130 (1985) was a Supreme Court case in which the court held that the Fifth Amendment 's Grand Jury Clause is not violated if a federal defendant is found guilty by a trial jury without having found "all" parts of an indictment proved.
United States v. Miller, 425 U.S. 435 (1976), was a United States Supreme Court that held that bank records are not subject to protection under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. [1] The case, along with Smith v. Maryland, established the principle of the third-party doctrine in relation to privacy rights.
Miller v. United States , 357 U.S. 301 (1958), was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court , which held that one could not lawfully be arrested in one's home by officers breaking in without first giving one notice of their authority and purpose.
United States v. Miller or Miller v. United States may refer to: United States v. Miller, a 1939 landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court that involved a Second Amendment challenge to the National Firearms Act of 1934; Miller v. United States, a 1958 U.S. Supreme Court case that dealt with Luke Miller and the subject of unlawful entry; Miller v.
The Miller test, also called the three-prong obscenity test, is the United States Supreme Court's test for determining whether speech or expression can be labeled obscene, in which case it is not protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and can be prohibited. [1] [2]
Case name Citation Date decided Abbott Laboratories v. Portland Retail Druggists Ass'n, Inc. 425 U.S. 1: 1976: Middendorf v. Henry: 425 U.S. 25: 1976: Carey v.
He argues that Article V remains the most clear and powerful way to register the sovereign desires of the American public with regard to alterations of their fundamental law. In the end, Article V is an essential bulwark to maintaining a written Constitution that secures the rights of the people against both elites and themselves.