Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Kahler v. Kansas, 589 U.S. ___ (2020), is a case of the United States Supreme Court in which the justices ruled that the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution do not require that states adopt the insanity defense in criminal cases that are based on the defendant's ability to recognize right from wrong.
It may have been preceded by an optional "pre-answer" motion to dismiss or demurrer; if such a motion is unsuccessful, the defendant must file an answer to the complaint or risk an adverse default judgment. In a criminal case, there is usually an arraignment or some other kind of appearance before the defendant comes to court.
The new survey is required under a Kansas law that took effect July 1. But patients don’t have to answer the questions. ... Any attempt to limit abortion in Kansas must pass a strict legal bar ...
Hermesmann v. Seyer (State of Kansas ex rel. Hermesmann v. Seyer, 847 P.2d 1273 (Kan. 1993)) [1] was a precedent-setting Kansas, United States, case in which Colleen Hermesmann successfully argued that a woman is entitled to sue the father of her child for child support even if conception occurred as a result of a criminal act committed by the woman.
Kansas Republicans are pushing a bill to require abortion providers ask patients why they want an abortion and report the answers to the government.
Now that abortion rights are on the ballot in Kansas on Aug. 2, readers like Wendt in Leawood have reached out to The Star with questions. Wendt wants to know what options women would have if the ...
Coppage v. Kansas, 236 U.S. 1 (1915), was a Supreme Court of the United States case based on United States labor law that allowed employers to implement contracts—called yellow-dog contracts—which forbade employees from joining unions.
354 U.S. 1 (1957) treaty power, right to jury trial Watkins v. United States: 354 U.S. 178 (1957) rights of a witness in refusing to answer questions before the House Un-American Activities Committee: Yates v. United States: Free Speech: 354 U.S. 298 (1957) free speech, distinction between expression of opinion and advocacy of action Morey v. Doud