Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969), is a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court interpreting the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. [1] The Court held that the government cannot punish inflammatory speech unless that speech is "directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action".
Osborne v. Ohio, 495 U.S. 103 (1990), is a U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the First Amendment to the United States Constitution allows states to outlaw the possession, as distinct from the distribution, of child pornography. [1] In doing so, the Court extended the holding of New York v.
Two of the judges appointed to hear O'Toole's case, [Judge Patrick F. Fischer and Judge Vernon L. Preston,] had dissented in the O'Neill case. [8] The Ohio Supreme Court fined O'Toole and ordered her to pay the complainant's attorney's fees. [9] Justice Paul E. Pfeifer, concurring in part and dissenting in part, wrote the following
The Ohio Supreme Court ordered Summit County Common Pleas Judge Alison Breaux to unseal the records connected to Jeremiah Stoehr, 18, of Hudson.
The court said Yost can only review the summary of the petition, not the title and certify it as either fair and truthful statement before it can move on to the next step in the process.
Protective services appealed the case, which was then taken up by the Ohio Supreme Court. What does the case law decision say? The ruling, re R.G.M., Slip Opinion No. 2024-Ohio-2737, distinguished ...
The Supreme Court of the State of Ohio is the highest court in the U.S. state of Ohio, with final authority over interpretations of Ohio law and the Ohio Constitution. The court has seven members, a chief justice and six associate justices, who are elected at large by the voters of Ohio for six-year terms. The court has a total of 1,550 other ...
McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission, 514 U.S. 334 (1995), is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that an Ohio statute prohibiting anonymous campaign literature is unconstitutional because it violates the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which protects the freedom of speech.