enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Davis v. Washington - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davis_v._Washington

    Davis v. Washington, 547 U.S. 813 (2006), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States and written by Justice Antonin Scalia that established the test used to determine whether a hearsay statement is "testimonial" for Confrontation Clause purposes. Two years prior to its publication, in Crawford v.

  3. Trammel v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trammel_v._United_States

    Trammel v. United States, 445 U.S. 40 (1980), is a United States Supreme Court case involving the spousal privilege and its application in the law of evidence. In it, the Court held that the witness-spouse alone has a privilege to refuse to testify adversely; the witness may be neither compelled to testify nor foreclosed from testifying.

  4. Rock v. Arkansas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rock_v._Arkansas

    For example, when an individual with a criminal record testifies in their own trial, that past record can be presented to persuade the jury that they are the kind of person who would have done what they are accused of in the present. In a sense, the critics' worries have come to pass because relevant scholarship indicates that there is a ...

  5. Proud Boys Leader Called To Testify In Trial Of Former Cop ...

    www.aol.com/proud-boys-leader-called-testify...

    During the Proud Boys seditious conspiracy trial, prosecutors argued that Tarrio used his arrest for the burning of the BLM banner as an alibi for his whereabouts on Jan. 6.

  6. Taylor v. Illinois - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taylor_v._Illinois

    In the instant case, the Court held that a trial judge could hold the "presumption" that a new witnesses' testimony is perjured due to "a pattern of discovery violations". [24] The pattern in Taylor's case was a series of two amendments to the witness list done in bad faith. [ 25 ] "

  7. Retired pathologist travels from South Africa to testify in ...

    www.aol.com/retired-pathologist-travels-south...

    On Friday, more than two decades after his retirement, Forbes returned to Rochester to testify in the murder trial of Timothy Williams, who, through the use of what is known as "familial DNA," now ...

  8. Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melendez-Diaz_v._Massachusetts

    Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts, 557 U.S. 305 (2009), [1] is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that it was a violation of the Sixth Amendment right of confrontation for a prosecutor to submit a chemical drug test report without the testimony of the person who performed the test. [2]

  9. Bloomfield child abuse case moves forward as mother agrees to ...

    www.aol.com/bloomfield-child-abuse-case-moves...

    Michelle Bresch is scheduled to meet this week with prosecutors to discuss her testimony against her ex-husband in a 2021 child abuse case.