Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
This is because 2-chlorobutane possesses two different sets of β-hydrogens at the first and third carbons respectively, resulting in 1-butene or 2-butene. It is important to note that as a secondary alkyl halide, both E2 and Sn2 reactions are equally likely when reacting with a substance that can act as both a base and a nucleophile.
Figure 5 shows 2-chloro-2,3-dimethylbutane in a sawhorse projection with chlorine and a hydrogen anti-periplanar to each other. Syn-periplanar or synperiplanar is similar to anti-periplanar. In the syn-periplanar conformer, the A and D are on the same side of the plane of the bond, with the dihedral angle of A−B and C−D between +30° and ...
A: antiperiplanar, anti or trans. B: synclinal or gauche. C: anticlinal or eclipsed. D: synperiplanar or cis. [2] Rotating their carbon–carbon bonds, the molecules ethane and propane have three local energy minima. They are structurally and energetically equivalent, and are called the staggered conformers.
The gauche effect is very sensitive to solvent effects, due to the large difference in polarity between the two conformers.For example, 2,3-dinitro-2,3-dimethylbutane, which in the solid state exists only in the gauche conformation, prefers the gauche conformer in benzene solution by a ratio of 79:21, but in carbon tetrachloride, it prefers the anti conformer by a ratio of 58:42. [9]
A secondary deuterium isotope effect of slightly larger than 1 (commonly 1 - 1.5) is observed. There is no antiperiplanar requirement. An example is the pyrolysis of a certain sulfonate ester of menthol: E1 elimination Nash 2008, antiperiplanar relationship in blue Only reaction product A results from antiperiplanar
The stereoelectronic effect affecting the outcome of the facial selectivity of the diene in the Diels–Alder reaction is the interaction between the σ(C(sp 2)–CH 3) (when σ(C(sp 2)–X) is a better acceptor than a donor) or σ(C(sp 2)–X) (when σ(C(sp 2)–X) is a better donor than an acceptor) and the σ* orbital of the forming bond ...
The Cieplak effect relies on the stabilizing interaction of mixing full and empty orbitals to delocalize electrons, known as hyperconjugation. [2] When the highest occupied molecular orbital of one system and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital of another system have comparable energies and spatial overlap, the electrons can delocalize and sink into a lower energy level.
In organic chemistry, neighbouring group participation (NGP, also known as anchimeric assistance) has been defined by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) as the interaction of a reaction centre with a lone pair of electrons in an atom or the electrons present in a sigma or pi bond contained within the parent molecule but not conjugated with the reaction centre.