enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zermelo–Fraenkel_set_theory

    Von Neumann–Bernays–Gödel set theory (NBG) is a commonly used conservative extension of Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory that does allow explicit treatment of proper classes. There are many equivalent formulations of the axioms of Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory. Most of the axioms state the existence of particular sets defined from other sets.

  3. List of axioms - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_axioms

    Together with the axiom of choice (see below), these are the de facto standard axioms for contemporary mathematics or set theory. They can be easily adapted to analogous theories, such as mereology. Axiom of extensionality; Axiom of empty set; Axiom of pairing; Axiom of union; Axiom of infinity; Axiom schema of replacement; Axiom of power set ...

  4. Set theory - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Set_theory

    Set theory as a foundation for mathematical analysis, topology, abstract algebra, and discrete mathematics is likewise uncontroversial; mathematicians accept (in principle) that theorems in these areas can be derived from the relevant definitions and the axioms of set theory. However, it remains that few full derivations of complex mathematical ...

  5. Axiom of choice - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axiom_of_choice

    A proof requiring the axiom of choice may establish the existence of an object without explicitly defining the object in the language of set theory. For example, while the axiom of choice implies that there is a well-ordering of the real numbers, there are models of set theory with the axiom of choice in which no individual well-ordering of the ...

  6. Zermelo set theory - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zermelo_set_theory

    The axioms of Zermelo set theory are stated for objects, some of which (but not necessarily all) are sets, and the remaining objects are urelements and not sets. Zermelo's language implicitly includes a membership relation ∈, an equality relation = (if it is not included in the underlying logic), and a unary predicate saying whether an object is a set.

  7. Axiom of regularity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axiom_of_regularity

    Naive set theory (the axiom schema of unrestricted comprehension and the axiom of extensionality) is inconsistent due to Russell's paradox. In early formalizations of sets, mathematicians and logicians have avoided that contradiction by replacing the axiom schema of comprehension with the much weaker axiom schema of separation .

  8. Axiom of extensionality - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axiom_of_extensionality

    The axiom of extensionality, [1] [2] also called the axiom of extent, [3] [4] is an axiom used in many forms of axiomatic set theory, such as Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory. [5] [6] The axiom defines what a set is. [1] Informally, the axiom means that the two sets A and B are equal if and only if A and B have the same members.

  9. Axiom - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axiom

    Logical axioms are taken to be true within the system of logic they define and are often shown in symbolic form (e.g., (A and B) implies A), while non-logical axioms are substantive assertions about the elements of the domain of a specific mathematical theory, for example a + 0 = a in integer arithmetic.