Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
By converting a number less than n! to factorial representation, one obtains a sequence of n digits that can be converted to a permutation of n elements in a straightforward way, either using them as Lehmer code or as inversion table [1] representation; in the former case the resulting map from integers to permutations of n elements lists them ...
Enumerations of specific permutation classes; Factorial. Falling factorial; Permutation matrix. Generalized permutation matrix; Inversion (discrete mathematics) Major index; Ménage problem; Permutation graph; Permutation pattern; Permutation polynomial; Permutohedron; Rencontres numbers; Robinson–Schensted correspondence; Sum of permutations ...
This is the limit of the probability that a randomly selected permutation of a large number of objects is a derangement. The probability converges to this limit extremely quickly as n increases, which is why !n is the nearest integer to n!/e. The above semi-log graph shows that the derangement graph lags the permutation graph by an almost ...
Converting successive natural numbers to the factorial number system produces those sequences in lexicographic order (as is the case with any mixed radix number system), and further converting them to permutations preserves the lexicographic ordering, provided the Lehmer code interpretation is used (using inversion tables, one gets a different ...
The word "factorial" (originally French: factorielle) was first used in 1800 by Louis François Antoine Arbogast, [18] in the first work on Faà di Bruno's formula, [19] but referring to a more general concept of products of arithmetic progressions. The "factors" that this name refers to are the terms of the product formula for the factorial. [20]
The permutations of the multiset {,,,, …,,} which have the property that for each k, all the numbers appearing between the two occurrences of k in the permutation are greater than k are counted by the double factorial number ()!!.
A main problem in permutation codes is to determine the value of (,), where (,) is defined to be the maximum number of codewords in a permutation code of length and minimum distance . There has been little progress made for 4 ≤ d ≤ n − 1 {\displaystyle 4\leq d\leq n-1} , except for small lengths.
A two-sum formula can be obtained using one of the symmetric formulae for Stirling numbers in conjunction with the explicit formula for Stirling numbers of the second kind. [ n k ] = ∑ j = n 2 n − k ( j − 1 k − 1 ) ( 2 n − k j ) ∑ m = 0 j − n ( − 1 ) m + n − k m j − k m !