Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
LibreTexts (formerly called STEMHyperlibrary[1] and ChemWiki[2]) is a 501 (c) (3) nonprofit [3] online educational resource project. The project provides open access to its content on its website, and the site is built on the Mindtouch platform. [4] LibreTexts was started in 2008 by Professor Delmar Larsen at the University of California Davis ...
Source of the resource: While some of the definitions require a resource to be produced with an explicit educational aim in mind, others broaden this to include any resource which may potentially be used for learning. Level of openness: Most definitions require that a resource be placed in the public domain or under a fully open license. Others ...
This is an accepted version of this page This is the latest accepted revision, reviewed on 26 October 2024. Software licensed to ensure source code usage rights Open-source software shares similarities with free software and is part of the broader term free and open-source software. For broader coverage of this topic, see open-source-software movement. It has been suggested that this article ...
The Open Source Initiative (OSI) is one such organization keeping a list of open-source licenses. [1] The Free Software Foundation (FSF) maintains a list of what it considers free. [2] FSF's free software and OSI's open-source licenses together are called FOSS licenses. There are licenses accepted by the OSI which are not free as per the Free ...
Refdesk - free and family-friendly web site that indexes and reviews quality, credible, and current web-based resources. DeepDyve - big archive of literary and scholarly journal articles; free five-minute full-text previews. Library of free projects - Free project resources (but no software).
Comparison of open-source operating systems. These tables compare free software / open-source operating systems. Where not all of the versions support a feature, the first version which supports it is listed.
A non-free license is used to limit what free software movement advocates consider to be the essential freedoms. A license, whether providing open-source code or not, that does not stipulate the "four software freedoms", [3] are not considered "free" by the free software movement. A closed source license is one that limits only the availability ...
According to our content guideline on identifying reliable sources, a reliable source has the following characteristics: It has a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. It is published. It is appropriate for the material in question, i.e., the source is directly about the subject, rather than mentioning something unrelated in passing.