enow.com Web Search

Search results

1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network

2. Unicheck - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unicheck

   The check results are presented as a similarity report, where each of the similarities that have been found has a link to the source. These reports can be downloaded as PDF documents. Unicheck can be used as a stand-alone online tool, or integrated into an LMS (Learning Management System) via plugin , LTI , API or LTI+API types of integrations.

3. Content similarity detection - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Content_similarity_detection

   Check intensity: How often and for which types of document fragments (paragraphs, sentences, fixed-length word sequences) does the system query external resources, such as search engines. Comparison algorithm type: The algorithms that define the way the system uses to compare documents against each other. [citation needed] Precision and recall

4. PlagTracker - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PlagTracker

   PlagTracker is a Ukrainian-based online plagiarism detection service that checks whether similar text content appears elsewhere on the web. [1] [2] It was launched in 2011 by Devellar.

5. Turnitin - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turnitin

   The essays submitted by students are stored in a database used to check for plagiarism. This prevents one student from using another student's paper, by identifying matching text between papers. In addition to student papers, the database contains a copy of the publicly accessible Internet, with the company using a web crawler to continually ...

6. Comparison of anti-plagiarism software - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_anti...

   Submissions are limited to 1,000 words. Checking against abstract and titles in Medline/PubMed. [4] iThenticate: iParadigms 2004 2017 proprietary: SaaS: Latin PlagScan: PlagScan GmbH 2008 limited SaaS, On-Premises [5] Latin, Cyrillic & Arabic [6] [7]

7. Plagiarism - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plagiarism

   It assesses the readability of content and the writer's familiarity with the genre based on a comprehensive evaluation of word usage, genre conventions, and sentence structure. The final report page highlights sentences of plagiarism so that instructors can easily identify the corresponding content. [82] [not specific enough to verify]