Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In a 2-1 decision, judges of the Ontario Divisional Court dismissed the application for an order requiring the issue of a marriage licence, ruling "that under the common law of Canada applicable to Ontario a valid marriage can take place only between a man and a woman." [3]
The Ontario Teacher Candidates’ Council expressed its disappointment at the decision, while education minister Stephen Lecce welcomed it. [ 6 ] After the Divisional Court decision, some commentators suggested that the Ontario government should invoke the notwithstanding clause .
The Superior Court of Justice (French: Cour supérieure de justice) is a superior court in Ontario. The Court sits in 52 locations across the province, including 17 Family Court locations, and consists of over 300 federally appointed judges. [1] In 1999, the Superior Court of Justice was renamed from the Ontario Court (General Division).
The phrase "provincial court" or "territorial court" is often used to mean a lower court whose decisions can be reviewed by a superior court. Decades ago [when?], they were managed at the local municipal level. The Ontario Court of Justice is a division of the Court of Ontario. [7]
The Court of Appeal for Ontario (frequently mistakenly referred to as the Ontario Court of Appeal) (ONCA is the abbreviation for its neutral citation) is the appellate court for the province of Ontario, Canada. The seat of the court is Osgoode Hall in downtown Toronto (also the seat of the Law Society of Ontario and the Divisional Court of the ...
The court found that the provisions of the act infringed upon the section 2(b) rights of both candidates and electors. However, on appeal, the Court of Appeal for Ontario stayed the decision of the lower court, and a year later, it ruled that the provisions were constitutional. Subsequently, the City of Toronto appealed to the Supreme Court of ...
Canadian Union of Public Employees v Ontario (Minister of Labour), 2003 SCC 29, is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on arbitration and bias in administrative law. The court held that it was patently unreasonable for the Minister of Labour to appoint retired judges as arbitrators in labour disputes without considering their expertise ...
The Divisional Court had then, and still has, a complex statutory appellate and judicial review jurisdiction. [65] [66] The Courts of Justice Act, which presently constitutes Ontario's courts, [67] was first enacted in 1984, replacing the Judicature Act. [68]