Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
(JSON Schema Proposal, other JSON schemas/IDLs) Partial (via JSON APIs implemented with Smile backend, on Jackson, Python) — SOAP: W3C: XML: Yes W3C Recommendations: SOAP/1.1 SOAP/1.2: Partial (Efficient XML Interchange, Binary XML, Fast Infoset, MTOM, XSD base64 data) Yes Built-in id/ref, XPointer, XPath: WSDL, XML schema: DOM, SAX, XQuery ...
For types 2 (byte string) and 3 (text string), the count is the length of the payload. For types 4 (array) and 5 (map), the count is the number of items (pairs) in the payload. For type 6 (tag), the payload is a single item and the count is a numeric tag number which describes the enclosed item.
Certain JSON implementations only accept JSON texts representing an object or an array. For interoperability, applications interchanging JSON should transmit messages that are objects or arrays. The specifications allow JSON objects that contain multiple members with the same name.
JSONiq [11] is a query and transformation language for JSON. XPath 3.1 [12] is an expression language that allows the processing of values conforming to the XDM [13] data model. The version 3.1 of XPath supports JSON as well as XML. jq is like sed for JSON data - you can use it to slice and filter and map and transform structured data.
The binary file can store some information that cannot be captured in the XML or JSON file formats. The array, set and dictionary binary types are made up of pointers - the objref and keyref entries - that index into an object table in the file. This means that binary plists can capture the fact that - for example - a separate array and ...
A JSON Patch document is structured as a JSON array of objects where each object contains one of the six JSON Patch operations: add, remove, replace, move, copy, and test. This structure was influenced by the specification of XML patch.
During Kate Spade Outlet's sale, you can get a gorgeous crossbody for $70 (from $299), a chic leather satchel for $100 (from $429), an $83 tote, and more.
Compared to JSON, BSON is designed to be efficient both in storage space and scan-speed. Large elements in a BSON document are prefixed with a length field to facilitate scanning. In some cases, BSON will use more space than JSON due to the length prefixes and explicit array indices. [2]