Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Penalties awarded "in lieu of actual damages and profits" cannot be less than $250 for each case of copyright infringement. Manners v. Morosco: 252 U.S. 317: 1920:
DMCA notification procedures place the burden of policing copyright infringement on the owners of the copyright. CDA Section 230 means only “federal intellectual property," and does not include state right of publicity claims. Perfect 10 v. Visa: 494 F.3d 788: 9th Cir. 2007 A case about secondary copyright infringement Kahle v. Gonzales: No ...
Columbia Pictures Television, Inc., 523 U.S. 340 (1998), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that if there is to be an award of statutory damages in a copyright infringement case, then the opposing party has the right to demand a jury trial. [1]
The court states the test for copyright infringement as copying an item that is the subject of a valid copyright, making no mention of improper appropriation of protectable elements, or in fact any distinction between protectable and unprotectable elements of Steinberg's drawing. This is in contrast to the 2nd Circuit's prior opinion in Nichols v.
A federal judge ruled Tuesday that a copyright infringement lawsuit against Bad Bunny, Karol G, J Balvin and dozens more reggaeton artists can move forward.
The music icon, her record label, Sony Music, Jay-Z, and other parties are being sued by New Orleans-based group Da […]
In total, Viacom claimed direct infringement and indirect infringement, specifically inducement, contributory infringement and vicarious infringement. [ 7 ] Viacom did not seek damages for any actions after Google put its Content ID filtering system in place in early 2008, and instead pursued declaratory relief on the ability of American ...
A federal judge has allowed parts of a $250 million copyright lawsuit to proceed against Elon Musk’s X, handing the social media company a blow as it faces allegations that it helped some people ...