Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Some jurisdictions allow parties in the case to inspect documents that are in the possession of individuals or organizations that are not a party in the case. [9] In general, courts have discretion to compel parties to disclose documents, and courts may also limit a party's right to access or inspect documents. [ 10 ]
In the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is governed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a); it may be effected using Model Form 9. [2] References
Zubulake II [9] - also released on May 13, 2003 found that the plaintiff was not under an obligation to report alleged securities violations contained in a deposition to the Court. Zubulake III [ 10 ] - released on July 24, 2003 applied the cost-shifting test outlined in Zubulake I based on the sample recovery of data from five backup tapes.
The six CO ligands are terminal and the Mo-Mo bond distance is 3.2325 Å. [2] The compound is prepared by treatment of molybdenum hexacarbonyl with sodium cyclopentadienide followed by oxidation of the resulting NaMo(CO) 3 (C 5 H 5). [3] Other methods have been developed starting with Mo(CO) 3 (CH 3 CN) 3 instead of Mo(CO) 6. [4]
Pleading in United States Federal courts is governed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. According to Rule 7, only these pleadings are allowed: [1] A complaint; An answer to a complaint; An answer to a counterclaim designated as a counterclaim; An answer to a crossclaim; A third-party complaint; An answer to a third-party complaint; and
(Mesitylene)molybdenum tricarbonyl arises from the reaction of molybdenum hexacarbonyl with hot mesitylene: [1]. Mo(CO) 6 + (CH 3) 3 C 6 H 3 → Mo(CO) 3 [(CH 3) 3 C 6 H 3] + 3 CO It can also be synthesized, with good yields by displacement of pyridine ligands of the trispyridine complex Mo(CO) 3 (pyridine) 3 in the presence of Lewis acids.
[Audita querela] is a writ of a most remedial nature, and seems to have been invented, lest in any case there should be an oppressive defect of justice, where a party has a good defence, but by the ordinary forms of law had no opportunity to make it. but the indulgence now shewn by the courts in granting a summary relief upon motion, in cases of such evident oppression, and driven it quite out ...
42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) Y & H Corp. , 546 U.S. 500 (2006), is a United States Supreme Court decision involving Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 , which provides a private cause of action to victims of employment discrimination . [ 1 ]