enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Giles v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giles_v._California

    Giles v. California, 554 U.S. 353 (2008), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States that held that for testimonial statements to be admissible under the forfeiture exception to hearsay, the defendant must have intended to make the witness unavailable for trial.

  3. Prior consistent statements and prior inconsistent statements

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prior_consistent...

    Note that under California Evidence Code ("CEC") §§769, 770, and 1235, prior inconsistent statements may be used for both impeachment and as substantive evidence, even if they were not originally made under oath at a formal proceeding, as long as "the witness was so examined while testifying as to give him an opportunity to explain or to deny ...

  4. California Evidence Code - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Evidence_Code

    The California Evidence Code (abbreviated to Evid. Code in the California Style Manual) is a California code that was enacted by the California State Legislature on May 18, 1965 [1] to codify the formerly mostly common-law law of evidence. Section 351 of the Code effectively abolished any remnants of the law of evidence not explicitly included ...

  5. Declaration against interest - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_against_interest

    Evidence of a statement by a declarant having sufficient knowledge of the subject is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule if the declarant is unavailable as a witness and the statement, when made, was so far contrary to the declarant's pecuniary or proprietary interest, or so far subjected him to the risk of civil or criminal liability, or ...

  6. Res gestae - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Res_gestae

    In 1997, the Law Commission argued that the primary use of it was to allow evidence from unavailable witnesses (including those who were deceased or in fear of testifying)—their proposal for a hearsay exception for this specific reason became section 116 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003. Given the existence of this, "it is difficult to see ...

  7. Crawford v. Washington - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crawford_v._Washington

    Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004), is a landmark United States Supreme Court decision that reformulated the standard for determining when the admission of hearsay statements in criminal cases is permitted under the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment.

  8. Brady disclosure - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brady_disclosure

    The motions can be made in a California Superior Court under California Evidence Code 1043–1046. [19] Notwithstanding, because of the broad nature of the discovery that the associated court rule and statute provide, getting actual records can be complicated.

  9. Pitchess motion - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pitchess_motion

    A Pitchess motion is a request made by the defense in a California criminal case, such as a DUI case or a resisting arrest case, to access a law enforcement officer's personnel information when the defendant alleges in an affidavit that the officer used excessive force or lied about the events surrounding the defendant's arrest. The information ...