Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
This article reads like a scientific review article and potentially contains biased syntheses of primary sources. Please replace inadequate primary references with secondary sources. See the talk page for details. (Learn how and when to remove this message)
Academics and other experts are invited to contribute a peer-reviewed review article to the journal, and must create a corresponding Wikipedia version of that review article. Although the content should be similar, the peer-reviewed article and the corresponding Wikipedia article are textually different in order to ensure accessibility of the ...
The article Article you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Article for comments about the article. Well done! Your GA nomination of Article. The article Article you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Article for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a ...
Random article; About Wikipedia; ... 3 Categories for pages using these templates. ... Toggle the table of contents. Template: Academic-written review/doc. Add ...
The PRISMA flow diagram, depicting the flow of information through the different phases of a systematic review. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) is an evidence-based minimum set of items aimed at helping scientific authors to report a wide array of systematic reviews and meta-analyses, primarily used to assess the benefits and harms of a health care ...
What links here; Related changes; Upload file; Special pages; Permanent link; Page information; Get shortened URL
This template should be used when the article appears to have been written by a reviewer on behalf of the subject of the article, or having some connection with the subject. It is used when the article is not necessarily representing a blatant opinion or opinion piece, but is still overly judgemental in tone.
In scientific writing, IMRAD or IMRaD (/ ˈ ɪ m r æ d /) (Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion) [1] is a common organizational structure for the format of a document. IMRaD is the most prominent norm for the structure of a scientific journal article of the original research type. [2]