enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Admissible evidence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Admissible_evidence

    The general rule in evidence is that all relevant evidence is admissible and all irrelevant evidence is inadmissible, though some countries (such as the United States and, to an extent, Australia) proscribe the prosecution from exploiting evidence obtained in violation of constitutional law, thereby rendering relevant evidence inadmissible.

  3. Relevance (law) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relevance_(law)

    Evidence that is of only some, even slight, probative value will be admissible, just as it is at common law. [27] Therefore, evidence is either relevant or it is not and if the evidence is not relevant then no further question arises about its admissibility. [ 28 ]

  4. Frye standard - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frye_standard

    In United States law, the Frye standard, Frye test, or general acceptance test is a judicial test used in some U.S. state courts to determine the admissibility of scientific evidence. It provides that expert opinion based on a scientific technique is admissible only when the technique is generally accepted as reliable in the relevant scientific ...

  5. Evidence (law) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence_(law)

    Evidence governs the use of testimony (e.g., oral or written statements, such as an affidavit), exhibits (e.g., physical objects), documentary material, or demonstrative evidence, which are admissible (i.e., allowed to be considered by the trier of fact, such as jury) in a judicial or administrative proceeding (e.g., a court of law).

  6. Best evidence rule - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Best_evidence_rule

    [4] Lord Denning MR said that "nowadays we do not confine ourselves to the best evidence. We admit all relevant evidence. The goodness or badness of it goes only to weight and not to admissibility." [5] In the United States, the best evidence rule is part of Article X of the Federal Rules of Evidence (Rules 1001-1008). [6]

  7. Public policy doctrines for the exclusion of relevant evidence

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_policy_doctrines...

    A subsequent remedial measure is an improvement, repair, or safety measure made after an injury has occurred. FRE 407 [dead link ‍] prohibits the admission of evidence of subsequent remedial measures to show defendant's (1) negligence; (2) culpable conduct; (3) a defect in defendant's product; (4) defect in the design of defendant's product; or (5) the need for a warning or instruction.

  8. Civil discovery under United States federal law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_discovery_under...

    Anything that is relevant is available for the other party to request, as long as it is not privileged or otherwise protected. Under §1, relevance is defined as anything more or less likely to prove a fact that affects the outcome of the claim. It does not have to be admissible in court as long as it could reasonably lead to admissible evidence.

  9. Huddleston v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huddleston_v._United_States

    Huddleston v. United States, 485 U.S. 681 (1988), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that before admitting evidence of extrinsic acts under Rule 404(b) of the Federal Rules of Evidence, federal courts should assess the evidence's sufficiency under Federal Rule of Evidence 104(b). Under 104(b), "[w]hen the relevancy of ...