Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In the 1960s, Christie and his colleagues would then develop a test using a selection of statements, including truncated and edited sentences that they viewed were similar to the general writing style found in Machiavelli's works such as The Prince and The Discourses on Livy as test items, naming the construct "Machiavellianism" after him.
[4]: 3 While conceptualizing a scale for manipulative behavior, he was reminded of the works of Niccolò Machiavelli, which shocked and intrigued Christie when he was an undergraduate. [5] Christie and his colleagues would then develop a psychometric test consisting of colloquialized statements similar to the general writing style of ...
Even though Machiavelli has become most famous for his work on principalities, scholars also give attention to the exhortations in his other works of political philosophy. While less well known than The Prince , the Discourses on Livy (composed c. 1517 ) has been said to have paved the way for modern republicanism . [ 16 ]
A short excerpt in English may be found in Allan Gilbert's Machiavelli Volume One. In 1503, one year after his missions to Cesare Borgia, Machiavelli wrote a short work, Del modo di trattare i sudditi della Val di Chiana ribellati (On the Way to Deal with the Rebel Subjects of the Valdichiana).
The MACH-IV has 20 questions, all which are designed to tap into the following factors: "Views", "Tactics", and "Morality". The "Views" factor is related to beliefs that are self interested and cynical, the "Tactics" factor focuses on the endorsement of manipulation as a means to take advantage of others, and the "Morality" factor deals with one's adherence to moral scruple.
The Art of War (Machiavelli book) D. Dark Triad Dirty Dozen; Discourses on Livy; M. Niccolò Machiavelli; ... This page was last edited on 30 May 2023, at 07:13 (UTC).
Machiavelli, after all, lived at a similar inflection point in history. Florence, one of the great Renaissance republics, was being transformed into a monarchy even at the moment he was writing.
On the one hand, then, Machiavelli erred by assigning too great a value on princely machinations that, Frederick claims, ended in disaster, as the king's evil actions are taken up by his subjects. On the other hand, and in support of the first idea, Frederick points out the numerous cases in which Machiavelli had ignored or slighted the bad ...