enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. The switch in time that saved nine - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_switch_in_time_that...

    In U.S. Supreme Court history, " The switch in time that saved nine " is the phrase—originally a quip by humorist Cal Tinney [1] —about what was perceived in 1937 as the sudden jurisprudential shift by associate justice Owen Roberts in the 1937 case West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish. [2] Conventional historical accounts portrayed the Court's ...

  3. Owen Roberts - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Owen_Roberts

    Owen Roberts. Owen Josephus Roberts (May 2, 1875 – May 17, 1955) was an associate justice of the United States Supreme Court from 1930 to 1945. [1] He also led two Roberts Commissions, the first of which investigated the attack on Pearl Harbor, and the second of which focused on works of cultural value during World War II.

  4. Judicial Procedures Reform Bill of 1937 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_Procedures_Reform...

    The Judicial Procedures Reform Bill of 1937, [1] frequently called the " court-packing plan ", [2] was a legislative initiative proposed by U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt to add more justices to the U.S. Supreme Court in order to obtain favorable rulings regarding New Deal legislation that the Court had ruled unconstitutional. [3]

  5. West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/West_Coast_Hotel_Co._v...

    Justice Roberts' vote to uphold the minimum wage law in West Coast Hotel, coming so soon after his vote to strike down a similar minimum wage law in Morehead, was unexpected and derailed Roosevelt's court reform bill. Many contemporary observers think Roberts' vote was a response to Roosevelt's court-packing plan, but Roberts denied it, and the ...

  6. Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hazel-Atlas_Glass_Co._v...

    Common law of civil procedure. Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co., 322 U.S. 238 (1944), is a much cited 1944 decision of the United States Supreme Court dealing with fraud on the Patent Office. [1] A widely quoted statement in the Court's opinion is: "The public welfare demands that the agencies of public justice be not so impotent ...

  7. Electoral fraud in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electoral_fraud_in_the...

    Electoral fraud in the United States, also known as voter fraud, [1] involves illegal voting in or manipulation of United States elections. Types of fraud include voter impersonation or in-person voter fraud, mail-in or absentee ballot fraud, illegal voting by noncitizens and double voting. Electoral fraud is extremely rare in the United States.

  8. Japanese American redress and court cases - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_American_redress...

    Korematsu v. United States, 1944. A case that focused on Japanese Americans who were denied citizenship and forced to move is the case of Korematsu v. United States. Fred Korematsu refused to obey the wartime order to leave his home and report to a relocation camp for Japanese Americans. He was arrested and convicted.

  9. Sorrells v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sorrells_v._United_States

    Sorrells v. United States, 287 U.S. 435 (1932), is a Supreme Court case in which the justices unanimously recognized the entrapment defense. However, while the majority opinion by Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes located the key to entrapment in the defendant's predisposition or lack thereof to commit the crime, Owen Roberts' concurring opinion proposed instead that it be rooted in an ...