Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Modifying the AIM-9X was seen as a cost-effective alternative to developing a new missile in a time of declining budgets. To achieve the range increase, the rocket motor would have a combination of increased performance and missile power management.
This includes driving simplification within our digital footprint and harmonizing common processes to take cost and complexity out of the business. ... $737 million for AIM 9X and $538 million for ...
Some sources have claimed the AIM-9X was decoyed by flares, [13] [14] ... will cost $1.1 billion and will be integrated for use on the F/A-18F Super Hornet, EA-18G ...
The four AIM-9X missiles expended for shooting down the three objects cost at least $1.5 million. [198] On February 17, the US and Canada suspended their search for the debris from the downed objects and the missile that missed. [199] [200]
Raytheon (RTX) set to offer software development, software risk reduction, existing software support, software improvements and production integration planning for the AIM-9X missiles.
AIM-9X is very different from the 1999 AIM-9M. The unit cost listed in the box is the total program cost divided by number purchased. I believe this counts all costs, R&D, etc for AIM-9X program. It cost money to make new things and that cost rolls into the unit cost. Maybe that's not what people expect for that infobox item.
The average unit cost of an MQ-9 is estimated at $32 million in 2023 dollars. ... the MQ-9 Reaper can carry multiple AIM-9X Sidewinder Block 2 missiles. [300]
In 1995, Hughes and British Aerospace collaborated on the "P3I ASRAAM", a version of ASRAAM as a candidate for the AIM-9X program. [citation needed] The ultimate winner was the Hughes submission using the same seeker but with the rocket motor, fuse and warhead of the AIM-9M. The latter was a US Air Force stipulation to ease the logistics burden ...