Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Michigan Dept. of State Police v. Sitz, 496 U.S. 444 (1990), was a United States Supreme Court case involving the constitutionality of police sobriety checkpoints. The Court held 6-3 that these checkpoints met the Fourth Amendment standard of "reasonable search and seizure." However, upon remand to the Michigan Supreme Court, that court held ...
Sobriety checkpoints set up by the German Police. Sobriety checkpoints or roadblocks involve law enforcement officials stopping every vehicle (or more typically, every nth vehicle) on a public roadway and investigating the possibility that the driver might be too impaired to drive due to alcohol or drug consumption.
In construing the terms DUI, DWI, OWI and OVI, some states make it illegal to drive a motor vehicle while under the influence or driving while intoxicated while others indicate that it is illegal to operate a motor vehicle. There is a split of authority across the country regarding this issue.
Science & Tech. Shopping. Sports
For example, a DUI checkpoint may be a valid response in an area that has had an abnormally high amount of drunk driving accidents. Police officers cannot set up DUI checkpoints on a whim. Law ...
DUI checkpoints became legal in 1990 under a ruling from the US Supreme Court. But, some lawyers say the supreme court never specified a driver's actions once in that checkpoint.
DUI checkpoints in South Carolina have to follow specific guidelines to be legal. Here’s how you can avoid them anyway. Skip to main content. 24/7 Help. For premium support please call: 800-290 ...
City of Indianapolis v. Edmond, 531 U.S. 32 (2000), [1] was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held, 6–3, that police may not conduct vehicle searches, specifically ones involving drug-sniffing police dogs, at a checkpoint or roadblock without reasonable suspicion. [2]