Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Among the many consequences of globalization, the hollowing out of American manufacturing has led to increased military spending but a loss of U.S. military strength. The reliance on overseas ...
On Trade, Trump 2.0 Won’t Be Like Trump 1.0—for Better and Worse. Scott Lincicome. November 20, 2024 at 4:09 PM ... As I explain in the introduction to our new Cato book on globalization, ...
In 2023, the U.S. experienced a trade deficit of $773 billion, with China as its largest trade creditor.The U.S. trade deficit has steadily grown since 2009, regardless of which party held the ...
The journalist Thomas L. Friedman popularized the term "flat world", arguing that globalized trade, outsourcing, supply-chaining, and political forces had permanently changed the world, for better and worse. He asserted that the pace of globalization was quickening and that its impact on business organization and practice would continue to grow.
The characters in Lynn Johnston's cartoon strip For Better or For Worse have extensive back stories. The birthdates of the characters given below were the characters' birthdates as shown on the strip's website [1] prior to the cartoonist's decision to re-boot the strip from 1 September 2008, returning the setting to the early years of John and Elly's marriage.
Hyper-globalization is the dramatic change in the size, scope, and velocity of globalization that began in the late 1990s and that continues into the beginning of the 21st century. It covers all three main dimensions of economic globalization , cultural globalization , and political globalization .
This is our final article in a series of three, where we argued that deglobalization was a simplistic and inaccurate way to describe the current trajectory of trade and investment, and we looked ...
Instead of globalization being about networks or a continuous flow, Tsing argues that we should think about it being created in two parts, the outside world (global) and the local. Globalization is seen as a friction between these two social organizations where globalization relies on the local for its success instead of just consuming it. [21]