Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
An agathist accepts that evil and misfortune will ultimately happen, but that the eventual outcome leads towards the good. [2] In other words, an agathist may see the world as essentially good but a place in which bad things can and do happen to good people. [citation needed]
God obeys the laws of logic because God is eternally logical in the same way that God does not perform evil actions because God is eternally good. So, God, by nature logical and unable to violate the laws of logic, cannot make a boulder so heavy he cannot lift it because that would violate the law of non contradiction by creating an immovable ...
When Bad Things Happen to Good People (ISBN 1-4000-3472-8) is a 1981 book by Harold Kushner, a Conservative rabbi.Kushner addresses in the book one of the principal problems of theodicy, the conundrum of why, if the universe was created and is governed by a God who is of a good and loving nature, there is nonetheless so much suffering and pain in it—essentially, the evidential problem of evil.
The anti-God that I take seriously is the malicious omnipotent omniscient being, who, it is said, creates so that creatures will suffer, because of the joy this suffering gives It. This may be contrasted with a different idea of anti-God, that of an evil being that seeks to destroy things of value out of hatred or envy.
No one god or goddess was fundamentally good or evil; this explained that bad things could happen to good people if they angered a deity because the gods could exercise the same free will that humankind possesses.
Bad things could happen. You know, things happen, but it’s going to be interesting.” Polls show the race between Trump and Harris may be the closest in American history.
Image credits: Konnie Enos #6. We got a call on Dec. 23th that my father-in-law was dying. He’d had a hard year and seemed to be doing better. He had diabetes since before I joined the family ...
Ecumenical interpretations of the wager [34] argues that it could even be suggested that believing in a generic God, or a god by the wrong name, is acceptable so long as that conception of God has similar essential characteristics of the conception of God considered in Pascal's wager (perhaps the God of Aristotle). Proponents of this line of ...