Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
On May 25, 2007, the state-owned Maroc Telecom ISP blocked all access to YouTube. [54] Officially, no reasons were given as to why YouTube was blocked, but speculations were that it may have been due to videos posted by the pro-separatist Polisario, Western Sahara's independence movement, or due to videos criticizing King Mohammed VI.
YouTube videos often have profanity bleeped or muted out as YouTube policy specifies that videos including profanities may be "demonetized" or stripped of ads. [10] Beginning in 2019, the bleep censor began to be more often used for censoring out words related to sensitive and contentious topics to evade algorithmic censorship online ...
According to YouTube, there is no bias against LGBTQ audience and creators, and there is no specific list to refer to when making the call about demonetization. YouTube's policies and systems only look at the content of the videos themselves. [42] 210 pro-Mainland China accounts Aug 23, 2019
A follow-up routine, titled "Filthy Words" (featured on his album Occupation: Foole) sees Carlin revisiting the original list and admitting that it is not complete, proceeding to add the words "fart", "turd", and "twat" to the list. He brings this up again in another follow-up routine, "Dirty Words" (featured in George Carlin: Again!
The search engine that helps you find exactly what you're looking for. Find the most relevant information, video, images, and answers from all across the Web.
Pastor Chris English, in an email to The Christian Post, said the use of the word nigga was "clearly over the line, and offensive". [6] He thought the video, parody or not, perpetuated many negative stereotypes about Christians, and as such, would have never worked in an outreach program for young people.
A college student who went on a drunken tirade using the n-word 200 times will now head to jail for a year.. Sophia Rosing, a former student at the University of Kentucky, became infamous in 2022 ...
A 2018 study of 2,585 articles in four academic journals in the field of ecology similarly found that very few titles were posed as questions at all, with 1.82 percent being wh-questions and 2.15 percent being yes/no questions. Of the yes/no questions, 44 percent were answered "yes", 34 percent "maybe", and only 22 percent were answered "no". [14]