enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Piercing the corporate veil - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piercing_the_corporate_veil

    Piercing the corporate veil or lifting the corporate veil is a legal decision to treat the rights or duties of a corporation as the rights or liabilities of its shareholders. Usually a corporation is treated as a separate legal person , which is solely responsible for the debts it incurs and the sole beneficiary of the credit it is owed.

  3. Gencor ACP Ltd v Dalby - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gencor_ACP_Ltd_v_Dalby

    Piercing the corporate veil, dishonest assistance Gencor ACP Ltd v Dalby [2000] EWHC 1560 (Ch) is a UK company law case concerning piercing the corporate veil . Facts

  4. Re Darby, ex p Brougham - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Re_Darby,_ex_p_Brougham

    Fraud, lifting the veil Re Darby, ex parte Brougham [1911] 1 KB 95 is a UK company law case concerning piercing the corporate veil . It is a clear example of the courts ignoring the veil of incorporation where a company is used to conceal a fraudulent operation.

  5. Kosmopoulos v Constitution Insurance Co of Canada - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kosmopoulos_v_Constitution...

    To reach this conclusion the Court examined the requirements to "lift the veil". Wilson J. explained: The law on when a court may disregard this principle by "lifting the corporate veil" and regarding the company as a mere "agent" or a "puppet" of its controlling shareholder or a parent corporation follows no consistent principle.

  6. Macaura v Northern Assurance Co Ltd - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macaura_v_Northern...

    He sold the timber there to Irish Canadian Sawmills Ltd for 42,000 fully paid up £1 shares, making him the whole owner (with nominees). Mr Macaura was also an unsecured creditor for £19,000. He got insurance policies - but in his own name, not the company's - with Northern Assurance covering for fire. Two weeks later, there was a fire.

  7. Here's what to know about Medicare's new $2,000 prescription ...

    www.aol.com/heres-know-medicares-2-000-174637852...

    Before the law, there was no out-of-pocket cap for Medicare's Part D, the section that covers prescription drugs, which left seniors at risk of "significant financial burdens," the AARP noted.

  8. Wallersteiner v Moir - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wallersteiner_v_Moir

    Fraud, lifting the veil Wallersteiner v Moir [1974] 1 WLR 991 is a UK company law case concerning piercing the corporate veil . This case was followed by a connected decision, Wallersteiner v Moir (No 2) , [ 1 ] that concerned the principles behind a derivative claim .

  9. From minimum wage increases to Medicare drug costs cap ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/minimum-wage-increases-medicare-drug...

    January 1 not only ushered in 2025 but a slew of new laws. ... Starting January 1, people enrolled in Medicare will pay a maximum of $2,000 on out-of-pocket prescription drugs, a new cap put in ...