enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Carpenter v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carpenter_v._United_States

    Carpenter v. United States, 585 U.S. 296 (2018), is a landmark United States Supreme Court case concerning the privacy of historical cell site location information (CSLI). The Court held that government entities violate the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution when accessing historical CSLI records containing the physical locations of cellphones without a search warrant.

  3. Reasonable expectation of privacy (United States) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reasonable_expectation_of...

    However, the Supreme Court has extended Fourth Amendment protections to the CSLI data generated by a cellphone tracking a user's movements because the disclosure is not voluntary, phone companies keep the records for years, and the invasive nature of the scope of information that can be gathered by tracking a person's movement for extended ...

  4. List of United States Supreme Court copyright case law

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    The Supreme Court was the source of a number of concepts in the field, including fair use, the idea-expression divide, the useful articles or separability doctrine, and the uncopyrightability of federal documents. This list is a list solely of United States Supreme Court decisions about applying copyright law.

  5. Third-party doctrine - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-party_doctrine

    United States (1967), the United States Supreme Court established its reasonable expectation of privacy test, which drastically expanded the scope of what was protected by the 4th amendment to include "what [a person] seeks to preserve as private, even in an area accessible to the public." In response to Katz v. United States (1967) and Berger v.

  6. Two rulings against open records. Is Ohio Supreme Court ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/two-rulings-against-open-records...

    The Ohio Supreme Court is considering other public records cases that could have sweeping implications for open government. Two cases involve how to interpret Marsy's Law, a voter-approved ...

  7. More than a dozen states have passed new laws that led to ...

    www.aol.com/more-dozen-states-passed-laws...

    The court’s decision isn’t likely to be released until this summer, and the justices have allowed the Texas law to continue in effect while the case proceeds (although a provision that ...

  8. Microsoft Corp. v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Corp._v._United...

    Microsoft Corp., was heard by the Court on February 27, 2018, with a ruling originally expected by the end of the Court's term in June 2018. [20] While the case was being decided by the Supreme Court, Congress introduced the Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data Act ("CLOUD Act") shortly after the oral hearings. Among other provisions, the ...

  9. NM Supreme Court orders foundation records be made public - AOL

    www.aol.com/entertainment/nm-supreme-court...

    Sep. 28—Records kept by foundations that fundraise and invest for New Mexico's public universities will be public records based on a court order issued this week, attorneys involved in the case ...