enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Presupposition - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presupposition

    Definite descriptions are phrases of the form "the X" where X represents a noun phrase. The description is said to be proper when the phrase applies to exactly one object, and conversely, it is said to be improper when either there exist more than one potential referents, as in "the senator from Ohio", or none at all, as in "the king of France ...

  3. Supremacy Clause - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supremacy_Clause

    In Martin v. Hunter's Lessee, 14 U.S. 304 (1816), and Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. 264 (1821), the Supreme Court held that the Supremacy Clause and the judicial power granted in Article III give the Supreme Court the ultimate power to review state court decisions involving issues arising under the Constitution and laws of the United States ...

  4. Basic Inc. v. Levinson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basic_Inc._v._Levinson

    Basic Inc. v. Levinson, 485 U.S. 224 (1988), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States articulated the "fraud-on-the-market theory" as giving rise to a rebuttable presumption of reliance in securities fraud cases.

  5. Plain meaning rule - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plain_meaning_rule

    In the US Supreme Court Chung Fook v. White (1924) marked the beginning of the looser American Rule that the intent of the law was more important than its text. This is sometimes termed the soft plain meaning rule , where the statute is interpreted according to the ordinary meaning of the language, unless the result would be cruel or absurd.

  6. Imbler v. Pachtman - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imbler_v._Pachtman

    Imbler v. Pachtman , 424 U.S. 409 (1976), was a United States Supreme Court case in which district attorneys or prosecutors were found to have full immunity from civil suits resulting from their government duties.

  7. Loving v. Virginia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loving_v._Virginia

    Loving v. Virginia , 388 U.S. 1 (1967), was a landmark civil rights decision of the U.S. Supreme Court that ruled that laws banning interracial marriage violate the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution .

  8. Vi coactus - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vi_coactus

    Vi coactus (V.C.) is a Latin term meaning "having been forced" or "having been compelled". In Latin, cōgō means "I compel" or "I force". The passive participle of cōgō is coāctus, meaning "having been forced" or "having been compelled" or "coerced" . [1] "Vi coactus" or "V.C." is used with a signature to indicate that the signer was under ...

  9. Paul v. Virginia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_v._Virginia

    Paul v. Virginia , 75 U.S. (8 Wall.) 168 (1869), is a U.S. corporate law decision by the United States Supreme Court . It held that a corporation is not a citizen within the meaning of the Privileges and Immunities Clause .