enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Comparison of programming languages (list comprehension)

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_programming...

    Python uses the following syntax to express list comprehensions over finite lists: S = [ 2 * x for x in range ( 100 ) if x ** 2 > 3 ] A generator expression may be used in Python versions >= 2.4 which gives lazy evaluation over its input, and can be used with generators to iterate over 'infinite' input such as the count generator function which ...

  3. List comprehension - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_comprehension

    Here, the list [0..] represents , x^2>3 represents the predicate, and 2*x represents the output expression.. List comprehensions give results in a defined order (unlike the members of sets); and list comprehensions may generate the members of a list in order, rather than produce the entirety of the list thus allowing, for example, the previous Haskell definition of the members of an infinite list.

  4. Time complexity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_complexity

    For example, a procedure that adds up all elements of a list requires time proportional to the length of the list, if the adding time is constant, or, at least, bounded by a constant. Linear time is the best possible time complexity in situations where the algorithm has to sequentially read its entire input.

  5. Algorithmic efficiency - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algorithmic_efficiency

    Timsort sorts the list in time linearithmic (proportional to a quantity times its logarithm) in the list's length ((⁡)), but has a space requirement linear in the length of the list (()). If large lists must be sorted at high speed for a given application, timsort is a better choice; however, if minimizing the memory footprint of the sorting ...

  6. Comparison of programming languages by type system

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_programming...

    Python: strong implicit (with optional explicit typing as of 3.5) nominal dynamic R: implicit dynamic Raku: partially implicit [TS 7] dynamic with optional static typing REBOL: strong implicit dynamic Rexx: typeless —, implicit wrt numbers — static+dynamic wrt numbers RPG: weak static Ruby: strong implicit — dynamic Rust: strong

  7. Cocktail shaker sort - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cocktail_shaker_sort

    For example, if every element is at a position that differs by at most k (k ≥ 1) from the position it is going to end up in, the complexity of cocktail shaker sort becomes (). The cocktail shaker sort is also briefly discussed in the book The Art of Computer Programming, along with similar refinements of bubble sort. In conclusion, Knuth ...

  8. Skip list - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skip_list

    () operations, which force us to visit every node in ascending order (such as printing the entire list), provide the opportunity to perform a behind-the-scenes derandomization of the level structure of the skip-list in an optimal way, bringing the skip list to (⁡) search time. (Choose the level of the i'th finite node to be 1 plus the number ...

  9. Comparison of programming languages - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_programming...

    1975-2013, R 0 RS, R 1 RS, R 2 RS, R 3 RS, R 4 RS, R 5 RS, R 6 RS, R 7 RS Small Edition [42] [43] Seed7: Application, general, scripting, web Yes Yes No No Yes Yes Multi-paradigm, extensible, structured No Simula: Education, general Yes Yes No No No No discrete event simulation, multi-threaded (quasi-parallel) program execution Yes 1968 Small Basic