enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wilson v. Arkansas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilson_v._Arkansas

    Wilson v. Arkansas, 514 U.S. 927 (1995), is a United States Supreme Court decision in which the Court held that the traditional, common-law-derived "knock and announce" rule for executing search warrants must be incorporated into the "reasonableness" analysis of whether the actual execution of the warrant is/was justified under the 4th Amendment.

  3. Hutto v. Finney - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hutto_v._Finney

    The Supreme Court handed down its decision in Hutto v. Finney on June 23, 1978. They called for a limit on the amount of time prisoners spent in solitary confinement. The Court fined the Department of Correction $20,000 because of the reluctance of prison officials to remedy the unconstitutional prison conditions in Arkansas. [8]

  4. Dubin v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dubin_v._United_States

    18 U.S.C. § 1028A, the federal aggravated identity theft statute, states: Whoever, during and in relation to any felony violation enumerated [elsewhere in the statute], knowingly transfers, possesses, or uses, without lawful authority, a means of identification of another person, shall, in addition to the punishment provided for such felony, be sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 2 years.

  5. Barbara Womack Webb - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbara_Womack_Webb

    Webb was elected to be the prosecuting attorney of the 7th and 22nd judicial districts of Arkansas. [3] In addition to being a prosecuting attorney she has served on the Arkansas Ethics Commission, Arkansas State Crime Lab Board, Arkansas Coalition for Juvenile Justice, and the U.S. Department of Justice Anti-Terrorism Task Force.

  6. Blueford v. Arkansas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blueford_v._Arkansas

    Blueford v. Arkansas, 566 U.S. 599 (2012), was a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States that clarified the limits of the Double Jeopardy Clause.The Supreme Court held that the Double Jeopardy Clause does not bar retrial of counts that a jury had previously unanimously voted to acquit on, when a mistrial is declared after the jury deadlocked on a lesser included offense.

  7. Flores-Figueroa v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flores-Figueroa_v._United...

    Flores-Figueroa v. United States, 556 U.S. 646 (2009), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States, holding that the law enhancing the sentence for identity theft requires proof that an individual knew that the identity card or number he had used belonged to another, actual person. [1]

  8. Arkansas psychiatrist accused of holding 26 patients against ...

    www.aol.com/arkansas-psychiatrist-accused...

    A psychiatrist at an Arkansas hospital has been accused of holding 26 people against their will and taking part in a medical insurance scam. Dr Brian Hyatt is being investigated by federal and ...

  9. Arkansas Supreme Court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arkansas_Supreme_Court

    The Superior Court of the Arkansas Territory was established in 1819. It consisted of three judges, and then four from 1828. It was the highest court in the territory, and was succeeded the Supreme Court, [ 1 ] established by Article Five of the 1836 Constitution, which was composed of three judges, to include a chief justice, elected to eight ...