Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The value of Manning's n is affected by many variables. Factors like suspended load, sediment grain size, presence of bedrock or boulders in the stream channel, variations in channel width and depth, and overall sinuosity of the stream channel can all affect Manning's n value. For instance, a narrow, rocky channel with irregular obstructions ...
The Gauckler–Manning coefficient, often denoted as n, is an empirically derived coefficient, which is dependent on many factors, including surface roughness and sinuosity. When field inspection is not possible, the best method to determine n is to use photographs of river channels where n has been determined using Gauckler–Manning's formula.
The Rosgen Stream Classification is probably best applied as a communication tool to describe channel form. [4] Other uses for the Rosgen Stream Classification include fish habitat indices, surveys of riparian communities, stream restoration and mitigation, engineering, evaluating livestock grazing related to stream type, and the use of ...
Strickler’s equation introduces a new emperical coefficient which must be determined experimentally to define n-value. However, unlike n-value, which has units of T/L 1/3, has units of length, and at least in theory, is a measurable quantity. [Notes 1] A measurable quantity is potentially useful for channel design and stream restoration ...
However, an important assumption is taken that Manning’s Roughness coefficient ‘n’ is independent to the depth of flow while calculating these values. Also, the dimensional curve of Q/Q(full) shows that when the depth is greater than about 0.82D, then there are two possible different depths for the same discharge, one above and below the ...
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
Upgrade to a faster, more secure version of a supported browser. It's free and it only takes a few moments:
Values of this coefficient must be determined experimentally. Typically, these range from 30 m 1/2 /s (small rough channel) to 90 m 1/2 /s (large smooth channel). For many years following Antoine de Chézy's development of this formula, researchers assumed that was a constant, independent of flow conditions.