Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The following other wikis use this file: Usage on en.wikisource.org Index:List of inscriptions on tombs or monuments in Bengal.pdf; Page:List of inscriptions on tombs or monuments in Bengal.pdf/7
The inscription was first published by M. B. Garde in 1918-19. It was subsequently listed by Bhandarkar and M. Willis. [1] An edition with translation was published in Epigraphia Indica in 1941-42. [2] A second edition appeared in the revised edition of Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum, volume 3, published in 1981. [3]
List of Satavahana dynasty rulers Serial. Nu Ruler Reign 1 Simuka: before 100 BCE 2 Kanha: c. 100–70 BCE 3 Satakarni I: c. 70–60 BCE 4 Satakarni II: c. 50–25 BCE Kshatrapa interregnum rule with vassal Satavahana kings: 5 Hāla (vassal under Kshatrapas) c. 20–24 CE 6 Nahapana (Kshatrapas King) c. 54–100 CE Restored Satavahana dynasty: 7
The inscription does not mention a year: it only states that it was issued on the occasion of a solar eclipse, on an amavasya (dark moon day) in the Chaitra month. In List of Inscriptions of North India edited by D. R. Bhandarkar, the inscription is dated to 17 March 1048 CE, but the text is silent on how this date was assigned. [32]
Gandhiji met Dr. Bhandarkar in 1896 at Pune, Bombay Presidency in regards to the South African Indian question. [2] As Superintending Archeologist of the Western Circle of ASI, he visited Mahenjodaro in 1911-12. He dismissed the ruins as only 200 years old, with 'bricks of a modern type' and 'a total lack of carved terra-cottas amidst the whole ...
The Hathibada Ghosundi Inscriptions, sometimes referred simply as the Ghosundi Inscription or the Hathibada Inscription, is the oldest Sanskrit inscriptions in the Brahmi script, and dated to the 1st century BCE.
The inscription and the image of Hanumān are frequently mentioned in the literature on Khajurāho. [2] The inscription was first noticed by Alexander Cunningham in the nineteenth century. [3] D. R. Bhandarkar revisited the inscription in 1904 and published a new reading, in addition to a fresh interpretation of the date. [4]
Pugalur inscription Hathigumpha inscriptions. 3rd century BCE 2nd century BCE 2nd century BCE [2] Arachalur: 2nd-century CE [3] Inscriptions in Kankali Tila: 2nd century BCE — 2nd century CE Akota Bronzes Inscriptions: 5th — 12th century CE Aihole inscription: 7th century CE Seeyamangalam Jain inscription: 892-93 CE Bijolia Jain inscription ...