Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Bourke v. Nissan Motor Corp., No. B068705 (Cal. Ct. App., July 26, 1993), was a California court case in which the Second Appellate District Court of the California Courts of Appeal upheld the original decision of the trial court in favor of the defendant, Nissan Motor Corporation, against the charges of the plaintiffs, who alleged wrongful termination, invasion of privacy, and violation of ...
Jonathan Gomez-Noriega, a former aide to Jersey City Mayor Steve Fulop, is suing the gubernatorial hopeful for wrongful termination, retaliation and discrimination, after he said he was fired in ...
A Los Angeles Superior Court judge has denied ABC’s bid to dismiss the COVID vaccination wrongful termination case filed by a father and son who ran the construction and special effects ...
Jurors have awarded $2 million to a former Pierce County prosecutor who sued the county for wrongful termination. They returned the $2,041,000 verdict Tuesday, Dec. 20, in favor of Doug Vanscoy ...
The court ruled that Hester "can move forward with the wrongful termination portion of his wide-ranging lawsuit against A&E and the producers of Storage Wars." [ 64 ] On July 15, 2014, it was announced that Hester and A&E came to a settlement, [ citation needed ] setting the stage for his return to the show on August 12, 2014.
An employment contract said ‘in the event of wrongful termination by way of liquidated damages the company shall forthwith pay to the Executive a sum equal to one year’s gross salary, pension contributions and other benefits in kind.’ Leisureplay plc claimed that the bonus should be void as a penalty clause.
Viewing surged for cable news and broadcast networks as they delivered a New York jury's verdict to convict Trump on 34 felony counts against him. ... A TV audience of more than 15 million watched ...
Honda Canada Inc v Keays, 2008 SCC 39, [2008] 2 SCR 362 is a leading case of the Supreme Court of Canada that has had significant impact in Canadian employment law, in that it reformed the manner in which damages are to be awarded in cases of wrongful dismissal and it declared that such awards were not affected by the type of position an employee may have had.