enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Williams v. Illinois (2012) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Williams_v._Illinois_(2012)

    Williams v. Illinois, 567 U.S. 50 (2012) was a United States Supreme Court case where it was ruled that having an expert witness testify on behalf of a third-party lab analyst does not violate the Sixth Amendment's Confrontation Clause as long as the results were not directed to prove guilt.

  3. Illinois v. McArthur - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illinois_v._McArthur

    Illinois v. McArthur, 531 U.S. 326 (2001), was a United States Supreme Court case decided in 2001. The case concerned the extent of the government's power to limit an individual's complete control of his or her home pending the arrival of a search warrant.

  4. Illinois v. Caballes - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illinois_v._Caballes

    Illinois v. Caballes, 543 U.S. 405 (2005), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held that the use of a drug-sniffing police dog during a routine traffic stop does not violate the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, even if the initial infraction is unrelated to drug offenses.

  5. Williams v. Illinois - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Williams_v._Illinois

    Williams v. Illinois, 399 U.S. 235 (1970), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that, if a person cannot afford to pay a fine, it violates the Equal Protection Clause to convert that unpaid fine into jail time to extend a person's incarceration beyond a statutory maximum length. [1] The syllabus of the case stated:

  6. Illinois v. Wardlow - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illinois_v._Wardlow

    Illinois v. Wardlow , 528 U.S. 119 (2000), is a case decided before the United States Supreme Court involving U.S. criminal procedure regarding searches and seizures . Background

  7. Napue v. Illinois - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napue_v._Illinois

    Napue v. Illinois, 360 U.S. 264 (1959), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the knowing use of false testimony by a prosecutor in a criminal case violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, even if the testimony affects only the credibility of the witness and does not directly relate to the innocence or guilt of ...

  8. Illinois Central Railroad Co. v. Illinois - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illinois_Central_Railroad...

    The Supreme Court decision in Illinois Central Railroad v. Illinois, 146 U.S. 387 (1892), reaffirmed that each state in its sovereign capacity holds title to all submerged lands within its borders and holds these lands in public trust. [1] This is a foundational case for the public trust doctrine.

  9. Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illinois_Brick_Co._v._Illinois

    Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois, 431 U.S. 720 (1977), is a United States Supreme Court case that involved issues concerning statutory standing in antitrust law.. The decision established the rule that indirect purchasers of goods or services along a supply chain cannot seek damages for antitrust violations committed by the original manufacturer or service provider, but it permitted such claims ...