enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Rogers v. Tennessee - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rogers_v._Tennessee

    Rogers v. Tennessee, 532 U.S. 451 (2001), was a U.S. Supreme Court case holding that there is no due process violation for lack of fair warning when pre-existing common law limitations on what acts constitute a crime, under a more broadly worded statutory criminal law, are broadened to include additional acts, even when there is no notice to the defendant that the court might undo the common ...

  3. Ex post facto law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ex_post_facto_law

    Ex post facto laws are expressly forbidden by the United States Constitution in Article 1, Section 9, Clause 3 (with respect to federal laws) and Article 1, Section 10 (with respect to state laws). In some nations that follow the Westminster system of government, ex post facto laws may be possible, because the doctrine of parliamentary ...

  4. Calder v. Bull - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calder_v._Bull

    The Connecticut legislature ordered a new trial in a court case about the contents of a will, overruling an earlier court ruling.In a unanimous decision, the United States Supreme Court held that the legislature's actions did not violate the ex post facto law in article 1, section 10 of the Constitution, which states:

  5. The Ex Post Facto Bar and the Prosecution of Crimes Against ...

    www.aol.com/news/ex-post-facto-bar-prosecution...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  6. Non-retroactivity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-retroactivity

    Non-retroactivity is the legal principle that laws do not apply retroactively and ex post facto laws are forbidden. This principle may be applied to judicial decisions as well as statutory law. This principle may be applied to judicial decisions as well as statutory law.

  7. Clear statement rule - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clear_statement_rule

    Statutory retroactivity has usually been disfavored and is in many instances forbidden by the Ex Post Facto Clause of the Constitution. [19] Therefore: Absent a clear statement from Congress that an amendment [to a statute] should apply retroactively, we presume that it applies only prospectively to future conduct, at least to the extent that ...

  8. Stogner v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stogner_v._California

    The Supreme Court upheld the trial court's ruling that the law was a violation of the ex post facto clause of the constitution by a split 5–4 decision. [2] The Supreme Court held that "a law enacted after expiration of a previously applicable limitations period violates the Ex Post Facto Clause when it is applied to revive a previously time ...

  9. List of Latin legal terms - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Latin_legal_terms

    ex post: from after Based on knowledge of the past. ex post facto: from a thing done afterward Commonly said as "after the fact." ex post facto law: A retroactive law. E.g. a law that makes illegal an act that was not illegal when it was done. ex proprio motu: by [one's] own motion Commonly spoken as "by one's own accord." ex rel