Ads
related to: background check warrant search californiareviewpublicrecords.com has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month
locationwiz.com has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month
checksecrets.com has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Riley v. California, 573 U.S. 373 (2014), [1] is a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the court ruled that the warrantless search and seizure of the digital contents of a cell phone during an arrest is unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment.
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
People v. Diaz, 51 Cal. 4th 84, 244 P.3d 501, 119 Cal. Rptr. 3d 105 (Cal. January 3, 2011) was a Supreme Court of California case, which held that police are not required to obtain a warrant to search information contained within a cell phone in a lawful arrest. [1]
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
Search incident to a lawful arrest, commonly known as search incident to arrest (SITA) or the Chimel rule (from Chimel v.California), is a U.S. legal principle that allows police to perform a warrantless search of an arrested person, and the area within the arrestee’s immediate control, in the interest of officer safety, the prevention of escape, and the preservation of evidence.
(Reuters) -California cannot enforce a law requiring people to undergo background checks to buy ammunition, because it violates the constitutional right to bear arms, a federal judge has ruled. In ...
Ads
related to: background check warrant search californiareviewpublicrecords.com has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month
locationwiz.com has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month
checksecrets.com has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month