Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Edelman v. Jordan, 415 U.S. 651 (1974), was a United States Supreme Court case that held that the sovereign immunity recognized in the Eleventh Amendment prevented a federal court from ordering a state from paying back funds that had been unconstitutionally withheld from parties to whom they had been due.
The Young doctrine was narrowed by the court in Edelman v. Jordan , which held that relief under Young can only be for prospective, rather than retrospective, relief; the court reasoned that the Eleventh Amendment's protection of state sovereignty requires the state's coffers to be shielded from suit.
Edelman v. Jordan: 415 U.S. 651 (1974) Eleventh Amendment and disability payments Storer v. Brown: 415 U.S. 724 (1974) Political campaign laws Village of Belle Terre v. Boraas: 416 U.S. 1 (1974) Upholding a zoning ordinance which prevented multiple unrelated people from living together Arnett v. Kennedy: 416 U.S. 134 (1974)
Case name Citation Date decided Renegotiation Bd. v. Bannercraft Clothing Co. 415 U.S. 1: 1974: Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co. 415 U.S. 36: 1974: Sampson v.
Municipal Court, 411 U.S. 345 (1973), the constitutional law Eleventh Amendment (re: sovereign immunity) decision Edelman v. Jordan, 415 U.S. 651 (1974) and the constitutional law Fifth Amendment (re: double jeopardy) decision Burks v. United States, 437 U.S. 1 (1978).
Edelman is a surname. Notable people with the surname include: ... Edelman v. Jordan, 1974 United States Supreme Court (11th amendment) Edelmann; Adleman
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us
The Court noted that Edelman v. Jordan, 415 U.S. 651 (1974), however, had recognized that "the Eleventh Amendment implicates the fundamental constitutional balance between the Federal Government and the States," Atascadero, at 238, the Court had applied a clear statement rule to waiver. The Court will only deem the state to have waived its ...