enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Ex parte Young - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ex_parte_Young

    Ex parte Young, 209 U.S. 123 (1908), is a United States Supreme Court case that allows suits in federal courts for injunctions against officials acting on behalf of states of the union to proceed despite the State's sovereign immunity, when the State acted contrary to any federal law or contrary to the Constitution. [1]

  3. Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seminole_Tribe_of_Florida...

    Case history; Prior: Motion to dismiss denied, 801 F. Supp. 655 (S.D. Fla. 1992); reversed, 11 F.3d 1016 (11th Cir. 1994); cert. granted, 513 U.S. 1125 (1995).: Holding; Congress does not have the power under the Commerce Clause to abrogate the sovereign immunity afforded to states under the 11th Amendment; the doctrine of Ex parte Young, which allows parties to seek relief against state ...

  4. Idaho v. Coeur d'Alene Tribe of Idaho - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idaho_v._Coeur_d'Alene...

    Idaho v. Coeur d'Alene Tribe of Idaho, 521 U.S. 261 (1997), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Coeur d'Alene Tribe could not maintain an action against the state of Idaho to press its claim to Lake Coeur d'Alene due to the state's Eleventh Amendment immunity from suit, notwithstanding the exception recognized in Ex parte Young.

  5. Hans v. Louisiana - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hans_v._Louisiana

    Ex parte Young (1908) determined that a citizen could sue a state official to prevent that official from carrying out a state policy that was deemed unconstitutional. Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer found that the Fourteenth Amendment gave the Congress the power to abrogate state immunity from suit to the extent that this was necessary to protect ...

  6. Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whole_Woman's_Health_v...

    The state judge and other state defendants responded by asserting their sovereign immunity defined in SB 8. District judge Robert Pitman denied the respondents' request to dismiss on August 25, 2021, stating that the state officials were subject to Ex parte Young exemptions, since the judges and clerks were central to enforcement of SB 8. [27]

  7. Defense attorney for rapper Young Thug found in contempt ...

    www.aol.com/news/defense-attorney-rapper-young...

    A Georgia judge has ordered a lawyer for rapper Young Thug to spend the next 10 weekends in jail after finding him in contempt. Defense attorney Brian Steel represents the rapper, who is currently ...

  8. ‘Y&R’ star Sharon Case reveals her ‘most difficult’ storyline ...

    www.aol.com/news/y-r-star-sharon-case-181705131.html

    Sharon Case talks to TODAY.com in an interview about her 30th "Y&R" anniversary and working with cast members like Joshua Morrow and Mark Grossman.

  9. Edelman v. Jordan - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edelman_v._Jordan

    Since the 1890 case Hans v. Louisiana, the Eleventh Amendment had been held to recognize the sovereign immunity of states from suits by their citizens. However, the 1908 case Ex parte Young had allowed an exception: citizens could seek injunctive relief against state officials to stop them from carrying out unconstitutional state policies.