enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Ex parte Young - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ex_parte_Young

    Ex parte Young, 209 U.S. 123 (1908), is a United States Supreme Court case that allows suits in federal courts for injunctions against officials acting on behalf of states of the union to proceed despite the State's sovereign immunity, when the State acted contrary to any federal law or contrary to the Constitution. [1]

  3. Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seminole_Tribe_of_Florida...

    Case history; Prior: Motion to dismiss denied, 801 F. Supp. 655 (S.D. Fla. 1992); reversed, 11 F.3d 1016 (11th Cir. 1994); cert. granted, 513 U.S. 1125 (1995).: Holding; Congress does not have the power under the Commerce Clause to abrogate the sovereign immunity afforded to states under the 11th Amendment; the doctrine of Ex parte Young, which allows parties to seek relief against state ...

  4. Idaho v. Coeur d'Alene Tribe of Idaho - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idaho_v._Coeur_d'Alene...

    Idaho v. Coeur d'Alene Tribe of Idaho, 521 U.S. 261 (1997), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Coeur d'Alene Tribe could not maintain an action against the state of Idaho to press its claim to Lake Coeur d'Alene due to the state's Eleventh Amendment immunity from suit, notwithstanding the exception recognized in Ex parte Young.

  5. Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whole_Woman's_Health_v...

    A motions panel of the Fifth Circuit ruled on September 10, 2021, subsequently rejecting the proposition that Texas state judges and their clerks are proper defendants in an action under Section 1983 of the Civil Rights Act or under the Ex Parte Young exception to sovereign immunity. The panel ruled that the state officials listed in the ...

  6. Edelman v. Jordan - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edelman_v._Jordan

    Edelman v. Jordan, 415 U.S. 651 (1974), was a United States Supreme Court case that held that the sovereign immunity recognized in the Eleventh Amendment prevented a federal court from ordering a state from paying back funds that had been unconstitutionally withheld from parties to whom they had been due.

  7. Live coverage: Convicted cop killer Othal Wallace to be ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/live-coverage-convicted-cop-killer...

    Daytona Beach Police Chief Jakari Young addresses courtroom ... they were submitted without a notice of filing and were ex-parte communications. ... as there was a brief struggle and Wallace drew ...

  8. Defense attorney for rapper Young Thug found in contempt ...

    www.aol.com/news/defense-attorney-rapper-young...

    A Georgia judge has ordered a lawyer for rapper Young Thug to spend the next 10 weekends in jail after finding him in contempt. ... ex parte communications that we have a constitutional right to ...

  9. Ex parte - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ex_parte

    In law, ex parte (/ ɛ k s ˈ p ɑːr t eɪ,-iː /) is a Latin term meaning literally "from/out of the party/faction [1] of" (name of party/faction, often omitted), thus signifying "on behalf of (name)". An ex parte decision is one decided by a judge without requiring all of the parties to the dispute to be present.