Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Venables and Thompson [1997] UKHL 25 is a UK constitutional law case, concerning the exercise of independent judgement in judicial review. Facts
[3] [4] Thompson and Venables led Bulger away from the New Strand Shopping Centre in Bootle, where Bulger was visiting shops with his mother. His mutilated body was found on a railway line two and a half miles (four kilometres) away in Walton, Liverpool, two days later. Thompson and Venables were charged on 20 February 1993 with abduction and ...
On sentencing, the act formally removes the role of the Home Secretary in sentencing of young people for grave crimes (such as murder) following the decisions by the House of Lords in R v Secretary of State for the Home Dept ex parte Venables and Thompson (1997) [5] and the subsequent case at the European Court of Human Rights, T. v United Kingdom.
R (Coughlan) v North and East Devon HA; R (Frack Free Balcombe Residents Association) v West Sussex CC; R (Gerber) v Wiltshire Council; R (Save Our Railways) v Director of Passenger Rail Franchising; R (Venables and Thompson) v Home Secretary; R (Vodafone Ltd) v Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform
What links here; Related changes; Upload file; Special pages; Permanent link; Page information; Cite this page; Get shortened URL; Download QR code
Constitutional law, Devolution in the UK: R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice and R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice [2019] UKSC 2: 30 January Criminal law: Applicants were not entitled to compensation under section 133 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 for criminal convictions which were subsequently quashed for being unsafe. [1]
R (Child Poverty Action Group) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2010] UKSC 54 8 December Housing benefit: Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine: Progress Property v Moorgarth Group [2010] UKSC 55 8 December Company law: Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine: Principal Reporter v K [2010] UKSC 56 15 December
The adoption of planning policy and its application to particular facts is quite different from the judicial function. It is for elected Members of Parliament and ministers to decide what are the objectives of planning policy, objectives which may be of national, environmental, social or political significance and for these objectives to be set out in legislation, primary and secondary, in ...