enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Bold hypothesis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bold_hypothesis

    In Popper's philosophy of science, scientific statements are always provisional, they have limits of application, and they could always be wrong. If a statement cannot even in principle be proved wrong, it cannot be a scientific statement. Thus, in Popper's eyes, the falsifiability criterion clearly demarcates "science" from "non-science". This ...

  3. Murphy's law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murphy's_law

    Murphy's law [a] is an adage or epigram that is typically stated as: "Anything that can go wrong will go wrong.".. Though similar statements and concepts have been made over the course of history, the law itself was coined by, and named after, American aerospace engineer Edward A. Murphy Jr.; its exact origins are debated, but it is generally agreed it originated from Murphy and his team ...

  4. Planck's principle - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck's_principle

    "It is of interest that even in the objective world of science man's mind is not more malleable than in the habit-bound world of everyday life. Max Planck maintained that a new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents, but because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it.

  5. Hume's fork - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hume's_fork

    Hume's strong empiricism, as in Hume's fork as well as Hume's problem of induction, was taken as a threat to Newton's theory of motion. Immanuel Kant responded with his Transcendental Idealism in his 1781 Critique of Pure Reason, where Kant attributed to the mind a causal role in sensory experience by the mind's aligning the environmental input by arranging those sense data into the experience ...

  6. The science behind why people think they're right when they ...

    www.aol.com/science-behind-why-people-think...

    There may be a psychological reason why some people aren’t just wrong in an argument — they’re confidently wrong, according to a study in the journal Plos One. The science behind why people ...

  7. Occam's razor - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam's_razor

    Rather than depend on provability of these axioms, science depends on the fact that they have not been objectively falsified. Occam's razor and parsimony support, but do not prove, these axioms of science. The general principle of science is that theories (or models) of natural law must be consistent with repeatable experimental observations.

  8. Here’s why Americans drive on the right and the UK drives on ...

    www.aol.com/why-americans-drive-uk-drives...

    One challenge Americans face when visiting the United Kingdom is learning to drive on the “wrongside of the road. The British drive on the left side of the road while we, in America, drive ...

  9. ‘The Darker Side Of Science’: 50 Posts That Would Probably ...

    www.aol.com/70-best-memes-darker-side-070036250.html

    Don’t punch down. I don’t mock science or scientists….I find a way to celebrate science because I love it. And I’ve found that I’m able to draw people into science with my sense of humor.”