Ad
related to: draft conflict of interest policy
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Proposal controversial edits first Those who feel the need to make controversial edits, in spite of a real or perceived conflict of interest, are strongly encouraged to not edit articles directly, and to instead submit proposed edits for review on the article's talk page along with a {{Request edit}} tag to attract users to review the edit, or to file a request for comment.
If you write a draft, If you create a draft, do it forwards by finding reliable sources first and then summarizing them (rather than writing the draft first and then sourcing it). Once the draft is finished, you can then ask someone to review it by typing {{subst:submit}}. if you request an article, be sure to add sources.
The biographies of living persons policy says: "[A]n editor who is involved in a significant controversy or dispute with another individual – whether on- or off-wiki – or who is an avowed rival of that individual, should not edit that person's biography or other material about that person, given the potential conflict of interest."
Conflict of interest in legislation; the interests of the poor and the interests of the rich. A personification of corrupt legislation weighs a bag of money and denies an appeal of poverty. Regulating conflict of interest in government is one of the aims of political ethics. Public officials are expected to put service to the public and their ...
Conflicts of interest increase the likelihood of biases arising; they can harm the quality of research and the public good (even if disclosed). [3] Conflicts of interest can involve research sponsors, authors, journals, journal staff, publishers, and peer reviewers.
If you feel this is too complicated, there is a plain and simple conflict of interest guide, which explains how to edit with a COI more simply. There is also an essay which has some best practices for editing with a COI at Wikipedia:Best practices for editors with close associations , which is designed to give you advice.
New articles are reviewed by new pages patrollers, experienced editors who check whether they conform to Wikipedia's core content policies and identify material that is not suitable for inclusion. This includes articles created directly in mainspace (the encyclopedia proper), or moved there from draft or user space (including sandboxes).
A draft will be deleted at MfD if there is a consensus that it meets one of the reasons for deletion under the deletion policy and that it is unlikely to ever be a viable article. [ note 11 ] Failure to demonstrate that the topic meets notability guidelines is not considered sufficient reason to delete a draft, [ note 12 ] unless it has been ...
Ad
related to: draft conflict of interest policy