enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Baker v. Carr - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baker_v._Carr

    Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that redistricting qualifies as a justiciable question under the Fourteenth Amendment's equal protection clause, thus enabling federal courts to hear Fourteenth Amendment-based redistricting cases.

  3. List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Warren Court

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Fong Foo v. United States: 369 U.S. 141 (1962) double jeopardy against federal courts Baker v. Carr: Redistricting, malapportionment: 369 U.S. 186 (1962) malapportionment of electoral districts; equal protection clause; one person, one vote: Goldblatt v. Hempstead: 369 U.S. 590 (1962) due process, takings clause, safety regulations NLRB v ...

  4. Political question - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_question

    Coleman v. Miller, 307 U.S. 433 (1939) – Mode of amending federal Constitution is a political question. Colegrove v. Green, 328 U.S. 549 (1946) – Apportionment of Congressional districts is a political question (Overruled by Baker v. Carr). Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962) – Apportionment of state legislatures is not a political ...

  5. List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 369

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    This page was last edited on 13 September 2023, at 02:33 (UTC).; Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License; additional terms may apply.

  6. One man, one vote - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One_man,_one_vote

    However, in Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962) the United States Supreme Court under Chief Justice Earl Warren overturned the previous decision in Colegrove holding that malapportionment claims under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment were not exempt from judicial review under Article IV, Section 4, as the equal protection ...

  7. Category:1962 in United States case law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:1962_in_United...

    Baker v. Carr; Beck v. Washington; D. State v. Driver; E. ... volume 369; List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 370 ... volume 370; List of United States ...

  8. Talk:Baker v. Carr - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Baker_v._Carr

    The Luther v Borden article correctly states that it is the law to this day - which is to say the Guarantee Clause is non-justiciable. Colegrove v Green simply relied on Luther, because there the appellant argued the districting violated the Guarantee Clause. The Colegrove article says it was overruled by Baker v Carr. As a practical matter ...

  9. Wesberry v. Sanders - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wesberry_v._Sanders

    Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962): Redistricting qualifies as a justiciable question, thus enabling federal courts to hear redistricting cases. Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533 (1964): Districts in State Legislatures must be approximately equal in population. Thornburg v.