enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. NLRB v. J. Weingarten, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NLRB_v._J._Weingarten,_Inc.

    NLRB v. J. Weingarten, Inc., 420 U.S. 251 (1975), is a United States labor law case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States.It held that employees in unionized workplaces have the right under the National Labor Relations Act to the presence of a union steward during any management inquiry that the employee reasonably believes may result in discipline.

  3. Garrity warning - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garrity_warning

    The Supreme Court found that the officer had been deprived of his Fifth Amendment right to silence. A typical Garrity warning (exact wording varies between state and/or local investigative agencies) may read as follows: You are being asked to provide information as part of an internal and/or administrative investigation.

  4. Weingarten Rights - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weingarten_Rights

    These rights have become known as the Weingarten Rights. During an investigatory interview, the Supreme Court ruled that the following rules apply: Rule 1 The employee must make a clear request for union representation before or during the interview. The employee cannot be punished for making this request. Rule 2

  5. Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifth_Amendment_to_the...

    If an employee invokes the Garrity rule (sometimes called the Garrity Warning or Garrity Rights) before answering the questions, then the answers cannot be used in criminal prosecution of the employee. [93] This principle was developed in Garrity v. New Jersey, 385 U.S. 493 (1967). The rule is most commonly applied to public employees such as ...

  6. Kalkines warning - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalkines_Warning

    The Kalkines warning is an advisement of rights usually administered by United States federal government agents to federal employees and contractors in internal investigations. The Kalkines warning compels subjects to make statements or face disciplinary action up to, and including, dismissal, but also provides suspects with criminal immunity ...

  7. United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_District...

    The United States District Court for the District of Indiana was established on March 3, 1817, by 3 Stat. 390. [1] [2] The District was subdivided into Northern and Southern Districts on April 21, 1928, by 45 Stat. 437. [2] Of all district courts to be subdivided, Indiana existed for the longest time as a single court, 111 years.

  8. Law Enforcement Officers' Bill of Rights - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_Enforcement_Officers...

    It provides them with privileges beyond those normally provided to other citizens. It was first set forth in 1974, following Supreme Court rulings in the cases of Garrity v. New Jersey (1967) and Gardner v. Broderick (1968). It does not prohibit police departments from subjecting officers to drug tests.

  9. Indiana Supreme Court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indiana_Supreme_Court

    The Indiana Supreme Court was established in 1816 when Indiana was granted statehood. The new Court replaced the General Court of the Indiana Territory, which consisted of a three-member panel. Housed in a three-room building it shared with the Indiana legislature, the Court held its first session in Corydon on May 5, 1817. Under the state ...